Ad

Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Friday, January 11, 2013

Earth Directed Solar Flares. Asteroid DA14...Watch Out. Solar Maximum.


INCREASING CHANCE OF FLARES: Big sunspot AR1654 is growing more active. It is now crackling with M-class solar flares, such as this one recorded by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory this morning at 09:11 UT:


AR1654 is getting bigger as it turns toward Earth: movie. Not only is the chance of flares increasing, but also the chance of an Earth-directed eruption.This could be the sunspot that breaks the recent lengthy spell of calm space weather around our planet

X-ray Solar Flares
6-hr max: M1 
1508 UT Jan11 
24-hr: M1 
0911 UT Jan11 
explanation | more dataUpdated: Today at: 2000 UT


Daily Sun: 11 Jan 13

Sunspots AR1652 and AR1654 have beta-gamma magnetic fields that harbor energy for M-class solar flares. Credit: SDO/HMI

SPACE WEATHERNOAA Forecasts
Updated at: 2013 Jan 10 2200 UTC
FLARE
0-24 hr
24-48 hr
CLASS M
50 %
50 %
CLASS X
05 %
05 %

Asteroid 2012 DA14 to sweep close on February 15, 2013

It’ll pass within the moon’s distance from Earth – closer than the orbits of geosynchronous satellites. But it won’t strike us in 2013.

A near-Earth asteroid – called 2012 DA14 by astronomers – will pass very close to Earth on February 15, 2013. Astronomers estimate that, when it’s closest to us, it’ll be within the orbit of the moon (which is about 240,000 miles away), and within the orbits of geosynchronous satellites (about 26,000 miles up). 2012 DA14 will be about 21,000 miles (35,000 kilometers) away. It will not strike Earth in 2013. Astronomers’ calculations of asteroid orbits can be trusted. After all, even decades ago, they knew enough about calculating orbits to send people to the moon and bring them safely back, and today we are able place our space vehicles in orbit around objects as small as asteroids.
So, no, 2012 DA14 won’t strike us in 2013. There was a remote possibility it might strike us in 2020, but that possibility has been ruled out also.

Asteroid 2012 DA14 will pass closest on February 15, 2013. As the image above shows, it will pass much closer than the orbit of the moon - closer even that orbiting geosynchronous satellites (22,000 miles). View larger. Image Credit: NASA
What will happen when Asteroid 2012 DA14 passes closely in 2013?
What will happen when it passes us? The short answer is … nothing. On the day it passes, most of us won’t see it or be aware of its passage, in any way. The asteroid won’t alter the tides. It won’t cause volcanoes. It’ll just sweep closely past us – as millions of asteroids have done throughout Earth’s four-and-a-half-billion-year history – some in your own lifetime.
The asteroid will be within range for small telescopes and solidly mounted binoculars, used by experienced observers who have access to appropriate stars charts. Here’s what NASA says about its visibility:
On [February 15, 2013], the asteroid will travel rapidly from the southern evening sky into the northern morning sky with its closest Earth approach occurring about 19:26 UTC when it will achieve a magnitude of less than seven, which is somewhat fainter than naked eye visibility. About 4 minutes after its Earth close approach, there is a good chance it will pass into the Earth’s shadow for about 18 minutes or so before reappearing from the eclipse. When traveling rapidly into the northern morning sky, 2012 DA14 will quickly fade in brightness.
What do we know about asteroid 2012 DA14?
Asteroid 2012 DA14 is a little guy, compared to some asteroids, although its size has not been pinned down precisely. It is thought to be about 45 meters across (nearly 150 feet across), with an estimated mass of about 130,000 metric tons.
If a space object 150 feet wide were to strike our planet, it wouldn’t be Earth-destroying. But it has been estimated that it would produce the equivalent of 2.4 megatons of TNT. How does that compare with other known impact events on Earth? In 1908, in a remote part of Russia, an explosion killed reindeer and flattened trees. But no crater was ever found. Scientists now believe a small comet struck Earth. That event has been estimated at 3 to 20 megatons. So 2012 DA14 is in the same approximate realm as the Tunguska comet (which, actually, might have been an asteroid instead). It would not destroy Earth, but it could flatten a city.
Of course, about 70% of our world is covered by oceans. That means the most likely landing spot of any incoming asteroid is in the water – not on a city or other populated area.
Astronomers at the Observatorio Astronómico de La Sagra in Spain discovered 2012 DA14 in early 2012. We know 2012 DA14′s orbit is similar to that of Earth. That is one reason the asteroid eluded astronomers until recently. You can be sure that many astronomers are carefully tracking 2012 DA14 now.
The orbit of 2012 DA14 is an inclined ellipse. In other words, it’s tilted sightly with respect to Earth’s orbit around the sun, and, like Earth’s orbit, it’s not circular but elliptical – like a circle that someone sat down on. According to Bad Astronomer Phil Plait, who appears to have used a computer program to look at its orbit:
The asteroid spends most of its time well away from our planet. However, the path of the rock does bring it somewhat close to the Earth twice per orbit, or about every six months. The last time it passed us was on February 16 [2012], when it was about 2.5 million km (1.5 million miles) away, equal to about 6 times the distance to the moon. That’s usually about the scale of these encounters — it misses us by quite a margin.
If we know it will miss us in 2013 and in 2020, why are astronomers still watching? In fact, the orbit of 2012 DA14 is not entirely pinned down, although it is known well enough to say for sure: it will not hit us next year, or in 2020.
But it will come close on February 15, 2013! It should be close enough to catch the attention of virtually everyone on Earth in February 2013, on what’s sure to be a media field day.
Will 2012 DA14 strike Earth in 2020?
No. In March 2012, when a collision between 2012 DA14 and Earth in 2020 was still remotely possible, I asked astronomer Donald Yeomans to clarify the risk. Yeomans is, among other things, manager of NASA’s Near-Earth Object Program Office at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. In March 2012, he told EarthSky that a 2020 collision between Earth and asteroid 2012 DA14 was …
… approximately one chance in 83,000, with additional remote possibilities beyond 2020. However, by far the most likely scenario is that additional observations, especially in 2013, will allow a dramatic reduction in the orbit uncertainties and the complete elimination of the 2020 impact possibility.
It turned out they didn’t have to wait until 2013. By May, 2012, astronomers had ruled out even the remote possibility of a 2020 collision.
Still, 2012 DA14 and asteroids like it are sobering.
Bottom line: The near Earth asteroid 2012 DA14 will have a very close pass near Earth on February 15, 2013. It will sweep approximately 21,000 miles from us – much closer than the moon’s orbit and closer than geosynchronous satellites. It will not strike Earth. Its orbit around the sun can bring it no closer to the Earth’s surface on February 15, 2013 than 3.2 Earth radii.



Solar Variability and Terrestrial Climate

The March Towards Max

The March Towards Max
These six images from SDO, chosen to show a representative image about every six months, track the rising level of solar activity since the mission first began to produce consistent images in May, 2010. The period of solar maximum is expected in 2013. The images were taken in the 171 Angstrom wavelength of extreme ultraviolet light.

Sun-Climate (tsi, strip)
Space-borne measurements of the total solar irradiance (TSI) show ~0.1 percent variations with solar activity on 11-year and shorter timescales. These data have been corrected for calibration offsets between the various instruments used to measure TSI. SOURCE: Courtesy of Greg Kopp, University of Colorado.


Sun-Climate (pacific anomaly, strip)
Composite averages for December-January-February for peak solar years. SOURCE: G.A. Meehl, J.M. Arblaster, K. Matthes, F. Sassi, and H. van Loon, Amplifying the Pacific climate system response to a small 11 year solar cycle forcing, Science 325:1114-1118, 2009; reprinted with permission from AAAS.


Sun-Climate (sunspot numbers, strip)
The yearly averaged sunspot number for a period of 400 years (1610-2010). SOURCE: Courtesy of NASA Marshall Space Flight Center.




Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Dinosaurs Farted Themselves Into eXTINCTion? Seriously a New Theory!


Can you believe this?   I laughed so hard about this one!!!  I'm going to tell you the "story" in my own words, with the facts involved, but the story that I refer to is found on Fox News.com.


Dinosaurs 'gassed' themselves into extinction, British scientists say



Okay, so British scientists have a new theory on how the dinosaurs became extinct.  



"What's that!", you say?


They say that dinosaurs literally FARTED themselves to their extinction, LOL!!!  


My husband and I were reading this in bed last night and were laughing so hard that we were almost crying.


We all know that scientists create "theories".  But, aren't there measurements and calculations?  Yep.  There were actual researchers that calculated the methane gases that might have been "oopsed" out of dinosaurs.  They calculated just how much gas was "let out" per year and say that it was enough to warm the planet and kill off the dinosaurs.


Just how did they compare the farts of the dinosaurs to the farts of today?  I sure wouldn't want to be part of that research team!


What happened to the asteroid theory?  What happened to the pole shift theory?  What happened to the volcano theory? What happened to Al Gore's theory on Global Warming?...and for that matter, is Al Gore behind this new theory?

Seriously!  How did scientists mathematically calculate the amount of methane excreted...no relieved of ...no farted by dinosaurs?

Did the scientists measure the methane excreted by cows and then divided that by the ton of the animal and multiplied that by the guessed tonage of each dinosaur, migrating the math, and farting the numbers out for a new scientific theory?  What a mammoth task!  

Have the scientists farted out a number for the gasious global warming caused by the farts of humans?  After all, didn't Al Gore say that it was the human population's consumption that was the problem?

How much longer do we have?  Will our farts end us all?  What can save us?  

Pretty soon, we'll be gassing into recycled plastic vacuum seal bags and the new NASA project will be to take those up to space and release the gasses into space, only to add to the already abundant space junk with the recycled plastic bags.

What do you think about this new gas bomb theory?

Really.  We want to know!

This is seriously a story that is seriously out there in the science community...  Seriously.  Just "Google" it.  I didn't believe it at first either.

Have a fantastic day!

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

What else is tucked under the rug?

The question this morning was "what do I put on my blog?".  There is so much going on in the world and I am all consumed with how it is all connected and is affecting us all in profound ways.

Weather is an interesting factor in all of this.  As you know, the weather patterns change, but we all share the same atmosphere.  What happens in Australia will eventually effect us in the United States.  The weather may change, but it circulates on a global scale.

Not only does the actual weather circulate on a global scale, but the effects of the weather disasters circulate as well.  Because of the weather disasters, including the effects on crops, you'll notice that the quality and availability of produce in your local grocery store has changed quite dramatically.  In my local grocery store, there have been signs above the produce, explaining that the quality may not be what we are used to seeing because of the destructive freezing weather.  When crops are destroyed or damaged, we all feel the pain.

Additionally, we have the issue of the earthquakes, the volcanic eruptions, and the Middle-East revolution that we continue to experience, all of which effect our security, our economy, and other aspects of our daily lives.  This has no exception on a global scale.  The only exception would be the severity of the produced effects.

There are other factors that you may not know about that are changing things where you live, making you sick, making you a guinea pig for biological experiments, and more.  Over the past few years, the things that I have learned about the government makes me sick to think that I trusted them fully not long ago.  Their secret societies are real.  The Bilderbergs.  The Illuminati.  More.  There are an elite group of people who are trying to rule the world without thinking of the consequences for the general population.  They speak words that seem beautiful to hear, but their actions don't match their grand speeches.

I'm not a crazy person.  I'm a highly educated, curious, researcher who has stumbled upon some interesting topics with some interesting theories.  I may not agree with the extremes that others do, but I do think there are things going on right under our noses without us being privy.  Here are just a few.

This video is one that I found fascinating.  I don't agree with many of the aspects that they put into it to make it more dramatic (i.e., the people in the planes, the blowing up of planes, etc), but I do think that it is a creative masterpiece when it comes to things like chemtrails, biological experiments, and other "secret" government issued things.



There is also the question of the mass animal deaths that scientists cannot find answers for.  This was the most recent...
****************************************************************************

Millions of fish found dead in California marina


Fish lie dead in the harbor area of Redondo BeachReuters – Fish lie dead in the harbor area of Redondo Beach, south of Los Angeles, California March 8, 2011. REUTERS/Lucy …
REDONDO BEACH, Calif. – Millions of dead fish were found Tuesday floating in a Southern California marina. Boaters awakened to find a carpet of small silvery fish surrounding their vessels, said Staci Gabrielli, marine coordinator for King Harbor Marina on the Los Angeles County coast.
California Fish and Game officials believe the fish are anchovies and sardines.
Experts had yet to determine what happened, but Gabrielli said the fish appeared to have moved into the harbor to escape a red tide, a naturally occurring bloom of toxic algae that can poison fish or starve them of oxygen.
High winds overnight might then have trapped the fish in the harbor, crushing them against a wall where they used up the oxygen and suffocated, she said.

*********************************************************************************
What if, your government has used weather warfare?  Would you trust your government or other governments?  What about Katrina?  Look at this from the History Channel and find out what you feel about the possibility that your government is, in fact, using weather warfare?



Here is another video that may interest you...



Patent...http://conspiration.ca/brevet_chemtrails/United%20States%20Patent%204,686,605.htm

Because of limited time with writing this post, I'll leave these pieces of information with you.  Mull them over.  Do your own research.  You'll find that you may have doubts as to the cause of certain weather disasters, earthquakes, and other things that you used to trust were just natural phenomena.  This is when your eyes open and you realize that there may be more tucked under the rug.

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Nuclear War Could Stop Global Warming? And Global Warming Was A Plan Hatched In The 60's?

Could A Small Nuclear War Reverse Global Warming?

Nuclear Bomb Global Warming
The Huffington Post  Dean Praetorius  First Posted: 02/26/11 12:25 PM Updated: 02/26/11 01:04 PM
230
60
Nuclear war is a bad thing.
Right?
Scientists from NASA and a number of other institutions have recently been modeling the effects of a war involving a hundred Hiroshima-level bombs, or 0.03 percent of the world's current nuclear arsenal, according to National Geographic. The research suggests five million metric tons of black carbon would be swept up into the lowest portion of the atmosphere.
The result, according to NASA climate models, could actually be global cooling.
In NASA climate models, this carbon then absorbed solar heat and, like a hot-air balloon, quickly lofted even higher, where the soot would take much longer to clear from the sky.
While the global cooling caused by superpower-on-superpower war could be catastrophic (hence the term "nuclear winter") a small scale war could have an impact on the world climate, saysNational Geographic. Models suggest that though the world is currently in a warming trend, small-scale war could lower global temperatures 2.25 degrees F for two-to-three years following war.
In more tropical areas temperatures could fall 5.4 to 7.2 degrees F.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/26/nuclear-war-global-warming_n_828496.html