Ad

Showing posts with label revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revolution. Show all posts

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Could Occupation Be Revolution? Occupy For Dummies.

u2rll.jpg




SATURDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2011


#Occupy For DUMMIES!

The Revolution is upon is?
It will not be televised.
It 
will be improvised.
It will be spread via social media...

You've been drawn into it. You see it on TV. You don't fully understand, because mainstream media is clueless. Even bloggers (who happen to be "people" too!) who don't normally write about politics have been drawn to publish #Occupy-related articles:

CONSERVATIVE P.O.V. comes via Michelle Malkin, whose syndicated column this week addresses the "Cost of the Occupiers"::: on the same post, Michelle explores the "Friday Showdown in NYC" as well as arrests and updates from other US Cities where #Occupy participants are being seen and heard.
Let's take a look at the REAL reasons behind #Occupy.

I delved into this briefly on Friday with a link to an excellent article appearing on The Simple Dollar.

BEFORE you go there, you really should read THIS: Dual Economy is a recent post that http://dave-lucas.blogspot.com/2011/10/occupy-for-dummies.html


‘Occupy Wall Street’ for Dummies


The victim of class warfare on the right can't remember where he left the sign that reads "Occupy the Large Vacant Space Between My Ears," although the snazzy hat conveys roughly the same idea.
For those of you wondering what this “Occupy Wall Street” thing is all about, look no further than the prolific Richard Salzman, who has stepped away from whatever criminal activities he’s on to now to enlighten us.

He explains in a letter to the North Coast Journal that protesters “are using their First Amendment Rights to fight back at the class war that’s been waged for two generations or more by Wall Street bankers and corporate America against working Americans.”

So yay protesters! Because if you can just get all those bad corporations shut down, there will be a lot fewer working Americans to defend.























What do you think?










Friday, September 16, 2011

The Great Recession. Will Riots Break Out As The Poverty Rate Rises?

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is worried that high U.S. unemployment could lead to the same kind of riots here that have swept through Europe and North Africa.


"You have a lot of kids graduating college, [who] can't find jobs," said Bloomberg, during his weekly radio show on Friday. "That's what happened in Cairo. That's what happened in Madrid. You don't want those kinds of riots here."


That was the mayor's response when asked about the poverty rate, which rose to 15.1% in 2010, its highest level since 1993, according to census data released Tuesday. About 46.2 million people are now living in poverty, 2.6 million more than last year.

"The public is not happy," he said. "The public knows there is something wrong in this country, and there is. The bottom line is that they're upset."


Riots have gripped various countries in European cities, including Athens and London, fueled by young people infuriated by high unemployment and austerity measures, which in some cases has led to looting. High unemployment among youth is also one of the driving forces behind the Arab Spring, as impoverished protestors in North Africa and the Middle East rose up against their heavy-handed governments.

"The damage to a generation that can't find jobs will go on for many, many years," said Bloomberg.
http://money.cnn.com/2011/09/16/news/economy/bloomberg_jobs_riots/index.htm?hpt=hp_t2


Answers to jobs crisis?
"
Representative JOHN BOEHNER: Well, let's be honest with ourselves. The president's proposals are a poor substitute for the pro-growth policies that are needed to remove barriers to job creation in America.
"
http://www.npr.org/2011/09/16/140533706/political-chat-boehners-answer-to-jobs-crisis


The jobs crisis began in 2001

at 05:25 PM ET, 09/14/2011



“Two less obvious factors predated the recession. The first is the steepness of the rise in job scarcity during the previous recession in 2001, which rivaled that during the deep downturn of the early 1980s. The second is the failure between 2003 and 2007 of jobs per jobseeker to recover from the 2001 recession...Unemployment increased during the 2001 recession, but it subsequently fell almost to its previous low. In contrast, job openings plummeted—much more sharply than unemployment rose—and then failed to recover. In previous recoveries, openings eventually outnumbered job seekers (where a rising blue line crosses a falling green line), but during the last recovery a labor shortage never emerged.” — Brookings’ Scott Winship, in a post you should read.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-jobs-crisis-began-in-2001/2011/08/25/gIQAMK3eSK_blog.html



Jobless Spikes



An Economy Running On Debt


The Jobs Gap.  Recovering Much Slower Than In Past Recessions.Charts above from http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/09/the-full-scope-of-americas-jobs-crisis-in-17-charts/244793/#slide1

Friday, April 8, 2011

Is Your Net Being Censored?

Threats to Internet Freedom

Internet Censorship - First Amendement Error

Threats to Free Speech on the Net: Censorship and Copyright Law



Despite the universally recognized benefits of the Internet revolution by academics and millions of Internet users everywhere, some special interests seek to undermine the core feature that has made the Internet so successful: its freedom.

There are two main threats to freedom of speech on the Internet today. The first threat to free speech on the Internet is website filtering and censorship by Internet Service Providers (ISPs).

Many Americans are unaware that Internet censorship is currently practiced in the United States. It’s true: the Associated Press recently caught Comcast secretly using Web filtering technologies similar to those used in China to censor the Internet.

The second threat to free speech on the Internet is oppressive copyright law enforcement by media conglomerates like Viacomand Warner Brothers. The old-fashioned, literal interpretation of copyright law in a digital age is threatening to stifle the creativity of our generation by criminalizing our creative social behavior. Some awesome Stanford University professors have played a crucial role in the fight to defend free speech on the Internet. Lawrence Lessig, professor of law at Stanford Law School and founder of the Stanford Center for Internet and Society has led the fight to preserve freedom on the Internet. Professor Lessig’s work to establishCreative Commons, a groundbreaking non-profit organization “devoted to expanding the range of creative works available for others to build upon legally” has been one of his greatest successes.

Monday, February 21, 2011

"Rivers of Blood" promised if uprising does not stop.

Gaddafi's Son: Last Gasp of Libya's Dying Regime?

Click here to find out more!
Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, son of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, pictured during a visit to Moscow on June 28, 2010
Sergei Karpukhin / Reuters
After the bloodiest few days in Libya's modern history — in which over 200 people are estimated to have been killed in clashes with security forces — the son of the country's leader Muammar Gaddafi told Libyans on state-run television that "rivers of blood" would flow with "thousands" of deaths if the uprising does not stop. At the same time, he promised a dialogue on new political freedoms and even a new constitution — the most drastic reforms Libya would undertake since Gaddafi seized power 41 years ago. "There is a plot against Libya," said the maverick leader's second son, Saif al-Islam, long regarded as Gaddafi's heir apparent, speaking after midnight, against a white backdrop showing an abstract map of the region. "The story is very dangerous," he said, wearing a suit and tie — a conscious break from his father's iconic tribal robes. "It is bigger than the Libyans and the young people in the streets, who are trying to imitate Tunisia and Egypt."
Despite a rambling speech of about 40 minutes, Saif did not explain the most urgent question gripping Libyans late on Sunday night: Where is Gaddafi himself? Rumors swirled around Tripoli late Sunday that Gaddafi — whose titles are Brotherly Leader and Guide of the Revolution — might have fled the capital, if not the country, as eastern Libya descended into chaos and massacres. Gaddafi was last seen riding atop a truck in Tripoli on Friday during rallies to support him, in which crowds appeared to celebrate his leadership with posters and chants.(See how the bloodshed proves Gaddafi's strong hand.)
Appearing alone, Saif seemed to be speaking on behalf of Libya's government, although he himself has no official role in it. The second son of the autocratic colonel who has ruled the country for more than four decades, Saif has been seen as the reformist hope of the country, in contrast to his brother Mutassim, Libya's national security adviser. But the speech he gave indicated that he was defending the dynasty's claim as the only guarantor of Libya's future and prosperity, hardly the fount of democracy he seemed to embody in an interview with TIME a year ago. Meanwhile, the cracks in the regime are mounting. Libya's permanent representative to the Arab League as well as its ambassador to New Delhi both quit yesterday, according to news reports. While Saif's talk was tough, his speech was unscripted and unfocused, which some might interpret as a sign of great strain.
The diplomatic-corps defections as well as the speech may also represent Saif's attempt to win a far more intimate battle — the struggle for succession of his father's rule, against his brother Mutassim, a key player in the security crackdown against the protests. "Saif al-Islam is likely seizing the opportunity to leverage himself in this power struggle," said the private intelligence company Stratfor in a written analysis after the late-night speech.
With an almost total news blackout, and cell-phone and Internet connections severely disrupted, video uploads and text messages over the weekend reported spectacular clashes in Libya's second biggest city Benghazi and several other cities in eastern Libya, including large-scale massacres in Benghazi and al-Baida on Sunday, some during funeral processions for those shot by snipers and regular security forces. Human-rights groups, battling to patch together the gruesome details from shaky telephone connections to hospital doctors and eyewitnesses, estimated the death toll at 233 as of Monday morning. And while the streets were reportedly quiet on Monday, protesters were celebrating in the streets of Benghazi, as they claimed control of Libya's second biggest city. As for Tripoli, schools, government offices and most shops were closed.(See photos of Muammar Gaddafi's rise to power.)
Until now, the violence has been largely contained to an area about 600 miles east of Tripoli. But late on Sunday night, the turmoil seemed to touch the heart of the capital itself — a gracious Mediterranean city where the InterContinental, Starwood Four Points and Marriott chains have all recently built large seaside hotels. After midnight on Sunday, a resident in one of Tripoli's upscale neighborhoods scribbled a message online saying that "thousand [people] with machetes and guns" were on his street, "looting, storming houses. We have barracked [sic] ourselves in our house." Shortly after, he signed off, saying "can't talk, not safe outside." Others reported hearing gunfire in Tripoli overnight to outside news organizations by phone.
Saif's speech mentioned no turmoil in the capital. Instead, he conceded that the heavy casualties in Benghazi and elsewhere were partly owed to "mistakes from the army" — presumably referring to units opening fire on unarmed demonstrators when the protests began last Tuesday. That remark was about the only concession he made, however. Instead, he warned that soldiers would have no reluctance to fire on demonstrators — a fact clearly demonstrated during the past few days — in contrast to the militaries' behavior in Tunisia and Egypt during the uprisings there during the past six weeks. "The army now will have a fundamental role in imposing security and bringing normality into the country," he said. "We will destroy all these elements of sedition. We will not give up any inch of the Libyan territory."
Last night's speech was not only a critical point in trying to stanch a nascent revolt against Libya's repressive regime. It was a turning point for Saif himself.(See how Saif could help reform Libya.)
Ever since the U.S. reached a détente with Libya in 2003 and lifted sanctions in 2005, Saif has acted as an assurance for the future, for oil companies who have plowed billions of dollars into the country during the past six years, even though he officially has no political title. In interviews with oil executives, all say that Saif is the person whom they would most like to see running Libya. He has made occasional appearances at the World Economic Forum. And during two visits to Libya, I've seen countless corporate executives from the U.S. and Europe line up for appointments with Saif.
For his part, Saif has stressed for years the need to end Libya's state-run institutions and open up its closed economy to foreign investment. He oversaw the creation of a new National Economic Development Board, whose head is Mahmud Gebril, an economist with a doctorate from the University of Pittsburgh. Another close Saif ally is the oil chief Shokri Ghanem, a former Prime Minister who lived for years in Vienna as an OPEC official and speaks flawless English. When government hard-liners tried to unseat the reformist Ghanem in 2009, Saif simply reinstalled him — no questions asked. It was, said one oil executive, a huge relief.
Urbane and cosmopolitan — he lives much of the time in London — Saif is also wily and ambitious. In 2009 and 2010 he pushed to have the country's so-called General People's Congress — an unelected body that meets to pass laws — discuss a new constitution, but finally retreated on the issue, apparently having lost out to hard-liners in the government.(See why Gaddafi feels secure despite the uprising.)
When I interviewed Saif in February last year at his home, set amid an orange grove in Tripoli, he said he firmly believed that almost all Libyans wanted total political freedoms, and he displayed open impatience with those who were blocking change, while stopping short of questioning his father's rule. When I asked what level of freedom he would like to see in Libya, he said, "I'm talking about the level of freedom like in Holland. We want those changes now, not in 10 or 15 years' time." He added, "In black Africa we see real democracy, real elections, real parliaments, real constitutions. Why don't we have the same as them?"(Comment on this story.)
Many protesters in Libya say they too want democracy and open elections, and, indeed, Saif last night promised a General People's Congress discussion on forging a constitution for Libya. Yet he showed no readiness to tolerate political dissent — and insisted that the current turmoil was the work of foreign instigators and Islamic separatists.
In an interview in Tripoli last February, Ghanem, the oil chief, said there "cannot be real economic reform without political reform." Saif made it clear on Sunday night that neither reform would occur without bloodshed.


Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2052842,00.html#ixzz1EbbR6hbb

Friday, February 18, 2011

Internet Crackdown...Bahrain



Internet Restricted in Bahrain as Protests Escalate


As protests continue in Bahrain, data suggests that access to many websites has been restricted there.
Arbor Networks, a security research company that tracks Internet traffic, told The New York Times on Friday that traffic into and out of Bahrain has dropped between 10% and 20% below expected levels. Traffic normally only drops that low during natural disasters or global sporting events.
The graph below shows Bahrain’s Internet traffic levels this week compared to average traffic levels during the previous three weeks. The traffic this week has been significantly lower than usual. Arbor Networks told The Times that it couldn’t absolutely rule out technical difficulties as a cause for the drop, though the most likely cause was blocked websites.
A Harvard University website that crowdsources reports of inaccessible webpages shows that many sites, including bahrainonline.org and bahrainrights.org, have been reported to be inaccessible. But almost all of the reports were made before the protests in Bahrain started.
Last month, Egypt blocked websites like Twitter and Facebook in response to unrest before blocking the Internet altogether (See that graph here). The success that Egyptian protesters had in ousting former president Hosni Mubarak despite these drastic digital measures is often cited as enhancing the confidence of protesters in BahrainAlgeria and elsewhere in the Middle East.
While data suggests that Bahrain is restricting the Internet in response to unrest in the same way Egypt did, Arbor Network’s Internet traffic data shows nothing out of the ordinary in Algeria’s Internet traffic (at least between February 10 and 13).


Print Story Email Story
http://mashable.com/2011/02/18/internet-bahrain/