Ad

Showing posts with label national security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national security. Show all posts

Saturday, October 27, 2012

POTUS Had to Give the "STAND DOWN" ORDER In Benghazi. Messages Watched 24/7/365. No Way Obama Didn't Know.

INTERESTING INFORMATION CAME IN FROM ONE OF MY MOST RELIABLE SOURCES.  THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN RELEASED A WHILE AGO, BUT THERE HAS BEEN A DANCE OF LIES DELIBERATELY DELAYING THE TRUTH...
"a former special ops planner said that there is no way Obama could not have known what was going on in Benghazi.  

He said those "flash" emergency messages from consulates, etc. aren't emails but come in another way, and there is someone standing by 24/7/365 to check such messages. 

When received, the message would have been given to someone who would then have been ordered to deliver it to the president immediately - not to anyone else 

The implication of this is that the order to "stand down" had to come from POTUS - the only others authorized to give such an order are the VP and Secretary of State, in that order... 

...(and one would assume only if POTUS is not able/available to do so). If all this is true, seems to me that this is another symptom of Obama's being unable to make tough decisions unless he has months to think about it."
HERE IS SOME MORE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT... 


'STAND DOWN': U.S. HAD TWO DRONES, AC-130 GUNSHIP, AND TARGETS PAINTED IN BENGHAZI




 27 Oct 2012, 12:02 PM PDT 112

Reports indicate two drones and an AC-130 gunship were in the area when Benghazi was attacked, yet their resources were not used.

This runs completely against the current explanation coming out of the White House, which is that Obama did everything he could once he learned of the attack. 
You'll remember that in the second presidential debate, Obama said that as "soon as I was aware the Benghazi consulate was being overrun, I was on the phone with my national security team." The not-so-subtle intimation is that Obama was stepping up to the protect the U.S. personnel who were in Libya. And in the wakes of their deaths, which weren't "optimal," we have been assured that stronger action wasn't taken stronger because those options weren't available.
Sec. of State Leon Panetta gave us another version this same excuse, saying: "The U.S. military did not get involved during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi last month because officials did not have enough information about what was going on before the attack was over."
There are three huge problems with the excuses Obama and Panetta are making.
1. It is now known that the U.S. had two drones in the area -- both of which were filming the attacks, sending back feeds in real time, and at least one of the drone may have been armed.  
2. Reports also indicate a Specter gunship, probably an AC-130, was in the area for backup. The gunship could have swooped in and not only leveled the playing field in the match between 50 attackers vs a handful of security personnel, it could have thrown the attack decisively in favor of the security personnel. 
3. The security personnel in Benghazi had painted a laser mark on the attackers outside the consulate. This mark would have made possible a response by the drones or the AC-130 routine had they been allowed to zero in on it. The member of the security team who was on the roof of the consulate, spraying machine gun fire down on the attackers, continually asked for backup from the AC-130. It never came.
Obama says he was doing everything he could, and Panetta says we didn't react more strongly because we weren't sure what was going on. Yet we now know two drones were sending back video of the attack in real time, and at least one of those drones may have been armed. We also know a massive AC-130 gunship could have been used for backup as well, but it was not. And we know that security was begging for backup and even marking targets with lasers for the drones and/or gunship so they could make quick work of the attackers. 
Yet Obama chose not to respond, and that's the bottom line.

SOURCE: WHEREABOUTS UNKNOWN OF ATTACKERS RELEASED TO LIBYA BY CIA



 27 Oct 2012, 2:04 PM PDT 

As a guest on Pennsylvania's Michael Smerconish Program on Oct 26, Obama spoke of the Benghazi attack: 

What happened in a Benghazi was a tragedy. We're investigating exactly what happened. I take full responsibility for the fact that I send these folks into harm's way and I want to make sure they're always safe.
He added:  
When that doesn't happen -- uhhhh -- we will figure out what happened and make sure it doesn't happen again. But my biggest priority right now is bringing those folks to justice, and I think the American people have seen that's a commitment I always keep.
Think about that. Obama said, "My biggest priority right now is bringing those folks to justice, and I think the American people have seen that's a commitment I always keep." Yet "according to a source on the ground at the time of the attack," Obama has not kept this promise. Rather, when the CIA captured three of the attackers, they were ordered to release them to Libyan authorities and are now unaware of their whereabouts. 
Who ordered the CIA to hand the three attackers over to Libya? 
CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood makes one thing clear -- the CIA didn't do it:  "We can say with confidence that the Agency reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible time in Benghazi. No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need, [and] claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate."
The CIA called for military support in Benghazi more than once on Sept 11. Those calls were not simply ignored, they were denied

Friday, August 24, 2012

National Security Leaks.

Feinstein Comments on National Security Leaks Emerge as Campaign Issue

gty barbara feinstein dm 120316 wblog Feinstein Comments on National Security Leaks Emerge as Campaign Issue
Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly/Getty Images

In remarks at the World Affairs Council, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, expressed concern Monday about leaks of national security information, saying, “The White House has to understand that some of this is coming from its ranks. I don’t know specifically where, but I think they have to begin to understand that and do something about it.”

Referring to David Sanger’s book “Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power,” Feinstein said, “There’s one book they can read and they’ll see it very clearly. And I think that should be the case.”

Feinstein said that “what the president actually knows about this is difficult because with respect to intelligence he is in a bubble. He has his daily brief, called the PDB, the President’s Daily Brief, early every morning. And so he gets briefing from intelligence I don’t believe for a moment that he goes out and talks about it, I don’t believe the briefers go out and talk about it, but who knows who else. And I think that the importance of this has to be really set by the president himself. And hopefully he will do it, and I think he’ll most likely read the book and see it himself.”

Referring to David Sanger’s book
“Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars
and Surprising Use of American Power,”
Feinstein said, “There’s one book they
can read and they’ll see it very clearly.
And I think that should be the case.”



Asked for more detail about the senator’s comments, a Feinstein aide says that when she said the leaks were “coming from its ranks,” the senator was referring to the Obama administration — the federal government — in general, not specifically individuals in the White House. The aide also said that the senator does not know who the leakers were; she was assuming.

read more here: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/democratic-senators-comments-on-national-security-leaks-emerge-as-campaign-issue-3/

Who’s leaking the White House’s classified national security information?

Kill lists for drone strikes personally ticked off by President Barack Obama, a terrorist bomb plot thwarted by a brave double agent, juicy details about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden – all leaked and now all fuelling a raging political brouhaha in this election year.

Presidents decry leaks, and Mr. Obama is no exception. “The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive,” Mr. Obama claimed after the most recent leak revealed another supposedly secret cyber-attack on Iran.

Opponents weren’t persuaded. “It’s obvious on its face that this information came from individuals who are in the administration.” said Sen. John McCain as the ‘leaks’ furor dominated the Sunday talk shows. “The president may not have done it himself, but the president certainly is responsible as commander in chief.”


Skillful, willful leaking has long
been part of the dark art of
enhancing presidential prowess.

Skillful, willful leaking has long been part of the dark art of enhancing presidential prowess. And – especially with those secrets so closely held that only a vanishingly few people know them – the likelihood of accidental or inadvertent disclosure is tiny.

Critics accuse the president – or loyal aides close to him – of deliberately leaking to boost Mr. Obama’s image as being even tougher, and more effective, at waging war on terrorists than his predecessor, George W. Bush. But those leaks risk the lives of agents in the field and make future and on-going covert operations more difficult.

Even as all sides claimed they only wanted to stop the leaks and haul the leakers before the courts, a partisan battle was under way. “The White House ... claimed that my criticism of the Administration’s involvement in, and culpability for, leaks of sensitive and classified information is ‘grossly irresponsible.’ No, what is grossly irresponsible is U.S. officials divulging some of the most highly classified programs involving the most important national security priorities facing our nation today,” said Sen. McCain, who lost to Mr. Obama in the 2008 presidential elections.

One revealing anecdote recently emerged about the bin Laden raid and high-level willingness to keeping secrets when political advantage is in play. According to then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who served in both the Bush and Obama administrations, those who watched the raid with the President agreed.

“In the Situation Room, we all agreed that we would not release any operational details from the effort to take out bin Laden. That all fell apart on Monday, the next day,” Mr. Gates said. It has since been leaked that the following day, Mr. Gates confronted one of Mr. Obama’s closest aides and suggested a new communications policy, consisting of “Shut the f–– up!”
In the current case, Mr. Obama’s embattled Attorney General Eric Holder has named two Justice Department prosecutors to probe the leaks.

“In the Situation Room, we all
agreed that we would not release
any operational details from the
effort to take out bin Laden. That
all fell apart on Monday, the next
day,” Mr. Gates said.

That, too, is coming under fire for being inadequate.

“Can you have the U.S. attorney assigned through the Attorney General to investigate something that is clearly going to be at the most senior levels of all of the executive branch – DOD (Department of Defense) and FBI, the attorney general’s office and even the president. I mean, some of the leaks – and the public leaks– are self-described aides or people who were in the Situation Room. That’s a pretty small but pretty important group of people,” said Rep. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

Sen. McCain was blunter. “Mr. Holder’s credibility with Congress is – there is none,” he said, adding that when a CIA agent Valerie Plame was outed during the Bush administration, a special independent counsel was appointed to investigate and – eventually – a top aide to former Vice President Dick Cheney went to prison.

The current leaks about kill lists for drone strikes and cyber warfare and double-agents deep inside al-Qaeda’s bomb-making cell in Yemen constitute the “most egregious breach of intelligence in anybody’s memory, (and) certainly requires a special counsel who is completely independent,” he said.

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/worldview/whos-leaking-the-white-houses-classified-national-security-information/article4246577/

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Human Mind Control. Are You Being Controlled?


Did Russia Just Announce A Pain/Mind Control Zombie Making Ray Weapon?

Hyped by 
Not sure if this is real or not. Worrying if real though. According to the Herald SunVladimir Putin announced that Russia has been testing mind-bending psychotronic guns that more or less turn people into zombies:
WHILE many believed it to be an April Fool’s Day joke, Vladimir Putin has confirmed Russia has been testing mind-bending psychotronic guns that can effectively turn people into zombies.

The futuristic weapons – which attack their victims’ central nervous system – are being developed by scientists and could be used against Russia’s enemies and even its own dissidents by the end of the decade.

Mr Putin has described the guns, which use electromagnetic radiation like that found in microwave ovens, as entirely new instruments for achieving political and strategic goals.
Plans to introduce the super-weapons were announced by Russian defence minister Anatoly Serdyukov.

While the technology has been around for some time, MrTsyganok said the guns were recently tested for crowd control purposes.

“When it was used for dispersing a crowd and it was focused on a man, his body temperature went up immediately as if he was thrown into a hot frying pan,” Mr Tsyganok said.
“Still, we know very little about this weapon and even special forces guys can hardly cope with it,” he said.

Research into electromagnetic weapons has been carried out in the US and Russia since the ’50s but it appears Putin has stolen a march on the US.
Precise details have not been revealed but previous research has shown that low-frequency waves or beams can affect brain cells, alter psychological states and make it possible to transmit suggestions and commands directly into someone’s thoughts.

Mr Putin said the technology is comparable in effect to nuclear weapons but “more acceptable in terms of political and military ideology”.
Mr Serdyukov said the weaponry based on new physics principles – direct-energy weapons, geophysical weapons, wave-energy weapons, genetic weapons and psychotronic weapons – were part of the state arms procurement program for 2011-2020.

Maybe there will be a reason to purchase that zombie safe house, after all.

Last year TexanAustin Fleming’s created the Vagabond Mobile Safe House Device, which incorporates potable water filtration, tracking devices and photovoltaic cells into a handy and stylish leather backpack.

The whole things flips out armadillo-style in under three minutes and is covered in reflective coating to confuse drooling marauders.
The design won the 2011 Architects Southwest Zombie Safe House competition.


Psychotronic Weapons Letter To Senate Committee

(The following letter is alarming and vital to the understanding of how far the issue of psychotronic weapons and projects aimed at controlling American citizens and people everywhere has progressed. This letter is dated February 9, 1994. The organization involved is no longer available at this address below. Ms. McKinney is said to be occupying a much lower profile these days. Nevertheless, this is an important document to consider)



Association of National Security Alumni Electronic
Surveillance Project P. O. Box 13625
Silver Spring, MD 20911-3625 


February 9, 1994 


Chairman John Glenn
Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs
340 Dirkson Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510 

Attention: Mr. Chris Kline


Subject: Involuntary Human Experimentation with Non-Ionizing Radiation 


Dear Mr. Kline: 


Senator Glenn's publicly-expressed outrage that this government has (once again) been found to be engaging in brutal forms of involuntary human experimentation, and his demand, in effect, that any and all forms of this type of experimentation be exposed was heartening. 


A large and growing number of people in this country hope that the Senator's expressed outrage was sincere, and that your Committee's investigations are not simply a means of diverting attention from complaints centering on this government's long-term role in involuntary human experiments with non-ionizing forms of radiation.


Now that the Departments of Defense, Energy and Justice have openly admitted that directed-energy weapons systems do indeed exist, complaints of experimentation with these systems can no longer be ignored. 


As stated to you during our telephone conversation last week, this Project is focused on complaints concerning experiments with non-ionizing, so-called "non-lethal," directed-energy weapons, surveillance and psychotronics systems. In bringing this to your attention, I am representing the interests, currently, of some 100 U.S. citizens, who are the subjects of both vicious forms of overt harassment and concurrent directed-energy harassment. 


The enclosed copy of Microwave Harassment and Mind-Control Experimentation is a preliminary investigative finding, only. The accompanying Supplement furnishes an update on the current status of this Project. 


I am also enclosing copies of letters exchanged with, and directed to the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, and the Food & Drug Administration, which are self-explanatory. I am also enclosing copies of two articles concerning John Alexander, of the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Nonlethal Weapons Division, which I will address below. Also enclosed is a letter to a woman in contact with this Project which addresses some of the effects of long-term exposure to these so-called "non-lethal" systems. Just as a matter of interest--DoD-sponsored "hy'e" in the media to the contrary notwithstanding--non-lethal weapons systems can be incredibly lethal.


They are not gentle systems, as this government would like for the public to believe. Questions which need to be asked by the Committee on Government Affairs, as a preliminary, are as follows: 


1. By what formal means are U.S. Government agencies, to include the
Department of Defense, prevented from testing "non-lethal", directed-energy weapons, surveillance and psychotronics systems on U.S. citizens under involuntary circumstances?


2. By what formal means are U.S. Government contractors and sub-contractors prevented from testing "non-lethal", directed-energy weapons, surveillance and psychotronics systems on U.S. citizens under involuntary circumstances? 


3. Why does the Energy Policy Act of 1992 fail to prohibit involuntary human experimentation with non-ionizing forms of radiation? 


4. How many members of Congress and of the Administration have investments in firms which are engaged in the development and testing of directed-energy systems? 


5. Why is Los Alamos National Laboratory, a Department of Energy agency, engaged in the development of "non-lethal", directed-energy systems? 


6. Why is John Alexander--a 30-year US Army Special Forces veteran with a long-term interest in the "psychotronics" (mind-control) aspects of directed-energy systems--regarded as being particularly qualified to direct the Non-Lethal Systems Division of Los Alamos National Laboratory?


7. Why is the Department of Energy (and John Alexander in particular) in the business of promoting "non-lethal" systems as tools for law enforcement, and as weapons systems for the military? 


8. Why are these "non-lethal" systems being kept classified? 


9. Where is the test data on the efficacy of these directed-energy weapons, surveillance and psychotronics systems being obtained, and who in Congress, specifically, is overseeing those experiments? 


10. Why is the Department of Defense pushing for an increase in the numbers of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers in this country? 


11. How many satellites launched under the auspices of DoD, the National Reconnaissance Office, and the Central Intelligence Agency are engaged in the surveillance of U.S. citizens" And how many of those satellites qualify as directed-energy emitters; i.e., as "amplified communications" satellites? 


12. What federal constraints have been placed on the construction of microwave towers and other antennae arrays in this country; and what assurances do U.S. citizens have that emissions from those towers and antennae arrays are not being used for involuntary human experimental purposes? 


14. Who in Congress is overseeing the construction and use of microwave towers and antennae arrays in this country?


15. Why is it that complaints by U.S. citizens concerning directed-energy harassment and experimentation are being ignored? 


16. Since Ms. .Susan Patrick Ford, of the Department of Defense, appears to be unable to answer the questions posed in my letter to her dated November 18, 1993, can you answer these questions? 


In sum, Mr. Kline, this is a problem which Congress can ill afford to ignore. There are many angry people in this country who are fed up with these experiments. (Not all experimentees are kept effectively isolated.) A number of experimentees recognize the rapidly burgeoning numbers of microwave towers and antennae arrays in this country are a part of the problem--a level of recognition which, indeed, may have prompted the destruction of two major "communications towers" in Chiapas, Mexico, shortly prior to that government's decision to close the borders to that state. 


A lawless government spawns a lawlessness, generally. It is apparent to me that this country is merely "testing its wings", so to speak, where lawlessness and chaos, at this stage, is concerned. Creating more prisons and hiring more police is not the solution. 


The U.S. Congress--and Senator Glenn's Committee, in particular,--is in a position to ensure that no government agency, surrogate or otherwise, has a license to run rampant over the human and civil rights of citizens of this country, and that this government, once again, learns to adhere to the principles which were the basis for this country's creation. 


Please do let me hear from you concerning the foregoing. 


Sincerely,
JULIANNE MCKINNEY
Director, Electronic Surveillance Project


source: http://www.rense.com/political/weapons/psychotr.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
source: http://thewe.cc/contents/more/archive/sound_as_weapon.html


Electronic Mind Control 
Alex Jones Show
March 8 2011
Dr. Nick Begich interviewed by Alex Jones Alex Jones:
Dr. Nick Begich a few months ago said Alex, you are focusing so much on Fluoride which lowers IQ and causes degeneration of the bones, sure that is important.


You are focusing on lead and things like that. What I see the Globalists most interest is in psychotronic, electronic, wave lengths, light.


Since I have had him on I've seen all these main-stream news articles about U.S. Patent 65061 for a nervous system manipulation by electromatic fields for monitors. We know there is the propaganda on TV.


We know there is the flicker rate that puts you in a dream highly suggestible state. But this is more than that. Literally hundreds of patents dealing with this.


DARPA is the mainstream news, in the Baltimore Sun, saying 'Oh! We're testing towers to calm you during emergencies.' Ceiling lights that send encoded data.


Flicker rates where your eyes are just like an infrared collector picking up part of that spectrum - programming part of your brain.


The data down power lines which they admit can control your thermostat, your refrigerator. There are invading through everything. They are years ahead of us technologically.


Reading these patents it says they can physiologically change you, including hurting you, potentially triggering heart attacks, you name it, through the television.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


....The constant wars, conflicts, terrorist outrages, financial worries and the countless other negative events engineered by the Brotherhood have been designed overwhelmingly to maintain humanity in a state of fear, therefore limited and disconnected from its true self. The encouragement of hatred, resentment, revenge, and condemnation (all manifestations of fear) have not only added to this, they have ensured the conditions for further conflict and fear.

Still more fear, in unimaginable amounts, has been stimulated by religion. The fear of God (fear of self) and the fear of death and ‘his’ judgment. It is the same with ‘science’ and the fear of dying and going to oblivion. Humanity is consumed and overwhelmed by fear and its multifaceted expressions and that’s why we are delinked from who we are.

The Babylonian Brotherhood has made sure we have remained ignorant of this by controlling what is taught in schools and universities, the institutions of ‘science’ and, therefore, what the media considers possible and credible in its arrogant and pathetic dismissal of anything which challenges the ‘norm. Humanity spends its life watching a movie screen believing it to be reality while the world as it really is remains hidden from view. Journalists are not reporting what is going on in the world, they are reporting the story line in the movie. I call CNN the movie channel. There is an added bonus for the manipulators of fear. 

 
Whenever anyone is in fear they give their power away to anyone they believe will protect them. The technique I call problem-reaction-solution is the manipulation of fear. It is fear, and its offshoots like resentment, which stimulates the calls for “Something must be done” after wars and other outrages which then leads to the Brotherhood frontmen offering their solutions.

What we are talking about here is mass mind and emotional control. If you take the definition of mind control to be manipulating a person’s mind so they think and act in ways that you want, how many people on Planet Earth today are not mind controlled? The deaths of President Kennedy and Princess Diana were part of this. Whatever people say about the true character of JFK, the perception was that he represented a new hope for the future.

Whether he did or not doesn’t matter. People thought he did and so that is what he represented to them. As many Americans have told me over the years, something died in the American psyche when he was murdered. Call it hope, innocence, whatever you like. Something deep in the spirit of America died with him. The underlying feeling was that the good die young and evil always seems to win. It was the same with Diana, the lady associated, quite rightly in this case, with the genuine expression of love.

When she died that wave of emotion which followed was not so much for her, the human being, it was for her, the symbol of love. The mass outpouring of grief was, if you look below the surface, the grief that something else had died with her. Love had died. Goodness had died. The good die young and evil always wins.

These are just two global examples of the mass psyche being manipulated into a sense of powerlessness and despair by the mind doctors of the Brotherhood at places like the Tavistock network in London. People in a state of fear, powerlessness and despair eventually switch off and become the sheep they are encouraged to be, drifting through their lives in numb subservience.

But the manipulation of the human mind and emotions, and the disconnection from the infinite ocean, goes much, much, deeper than this. Remember that while the reptilians of the lower fourth dimension are spiritually and emotionally unplugged, they are very mentally sharp and come from a high level of intellectual knowledge.

This knowledge has been hoarded in the Brotherhood secret society network since the ancient world while being sucked out of the public domain by the destruction of native cultures, the horrors of the Inquisition, and the burning of great esoteric libraries like the one in Alexandria.
Balance = harmony. Imbalance = disharmony.
If you want disharmony you need imbalance. It is a simple fact and this has played a fundamental part in the Brotherhood’s techniques.

The balanced female energy is the energy of intuition and reconnection. This is where the idea of a ‘woman’s intuition’ comes from. A female body is far more likely to manifest female energy in abundance and so most of the oracles, channellers and psychics in the ancient and modern world have tended to be women. But they don’t have to be. Men are just as capable of accessing their female polarity and using this creative force to connect with higher, intuitive levels of themselves.

But such a reconnection is not what the Brotherhood has wanted to see. They want humanity to stay in the consciousness prison. So they have done all they can to suppress the use of the balanced female energy. They used religion to make women servile to men with no opportunity to express themselves in their full glory.

At the same time they suppressed the female polarity in the male by creating the blueprint for what a man should be. Macho and aggressive is what we call a ‘real’ man (a lost and frightened little boy, in truth). These ‘real’ men were and are so delinked from their female energy that their intuition and connection with their higher selves is all but extinguished.

Meanwhile the Brotherhood initiates have been using the negative frequencies of the female energy (Hecate) to connect with their reptilian masters on the lower fourth dimension and to manipulate the world secretly from behind the movie screen. The suppression and perversion of sexual energy, the creative force, is another fundamental means of limiting human potential to manifest their infinite power for creativity and self-determination.

Interconnected with the manipulation of the female energy is the manipulation of time. This is another aspect of the symbolism in the Pont de L'Alma Tunnel. The Brotherhood has tuned the human consciousness into a false perspective of time and in doing so they have disconnected humanity from the rest of creation which operates on a different version of time. Thus humanity is living its life out of sync with the universe. No wonder there’s so much imbalance.

In truth there is no time. Everything just is and past, present and future are happening at once. It is only our perception of time that make events appear to be happening in a linear time line. But even in linear time, we have been unplugged from the natural flow. Nature is tuned to Moon time, the 28-day 13 cycles of the Moon. The woman’s menstrual cycle is tuned to the Moon and, appropriately, it is the Moon which takes the male solar energy and reflects it back at the Earth in a female form. The Satanists have their rituals and sacrifices every month under the full Moon when that female energy is at the peak of its power. They take this energy and manifest its negative polarityHecate.

The more negative female (intuitive) energy they can focus, the more powerful their connection with the ‘demons’ they seek to access and communicate with on other dimensions. This is why they programme sensitive psychics like Arizona Wilder to conduct their rituals. The native peoples of the world who still live by Moon time are far more in tune with nature because they are operating on the same time-energy flow as nature. They are in sync with it.

But in 1572 Pope Gregory announced that a new calendar was to be introduced, the Gregorian Calendar, and it was implemented in October 1582. It was another Brotherhood scam and the Gregorian Calendar became the fixed standard time for the planet. This means that the human mind is tuned to this manufactured flow of ‘time’ when we look at a clock, a watch, or plan the future with a diary. And where is the centre of this time system, the zero point from which all the world’s people tune their timepieces?

Why, it’s only Greenwich in London, across the River Thames from the City of London financial district, the Brotherhood’s operational heartland! And what was the inspiration for the Gregorian Calendar? The one used in...Babylon. The ancient Greek name for the Watchers or sons of the gods who interbred with the daughters of men was Grigori.2 It is the calendar of the Grigorithe reptilians.

It was the reptile-Brotherhood priests of Babylon who played the same game with time all those thousands of years ago. The Gregorian Calendar is a farce. It is the time equivalent of throwing all your clothes in a wardrobe and leaning against the door to stop it flinging open. The clothes may just about fit in the space if you push them in hard enough, but what a mess. Here we have a 12 month year of 60 minute hours and 24 hour days with the months so ill-fitting that some are 30 days, others 31, another 28, or 29 every four years. Yes, fits like a glove. But a sensible measurement of time was not the motivation. Disconnecting human consciousness from Moon time was the idea and the Gregorian Calendar removed the 13th Moon.

There should be 13 Moon-cycle months of 28 days, but instead we have 12 months and 12 Moon cycles. The Brotherhood hierarchy still operate their calendars to Moon time - another reason for their obsession with 13. Crashing the car of Diana (the Moon Goddess) into the 13th pillar was also symbolic of this removal of the 13th Moon from the human perception of time. And when you disconnect people from the natural flow of time, you are disconnecting them from all that operates in that flow of time. Thus the Western (and increasingly global) ‘civilisation’ has lost its rapport with the natural world and is out of sync with its environment.

The Millennium is a manufactured point in time. The moment at which the Millennium is crossed to the year 2000 only exists because of the Gregorian Calendar, but as the human psyche is tuned to that, the Brotherhood is again planning to manipulate time across the Millennium. As the Millennium approached, the tallest building in Europe was built across the River Thames from the Greenwich Observatory in London, the zero point of so-called Greenwich Mean Time.

This building, named Canary Wharf, was built by a consortium of Brotherhood business interests and it is an enormous glass obelisk. Later the British Government decided to spend the best part of a billion, yes a billion, pounds to build a vast dome, the Millennium Dome, which will be the focus of official celebration at the time of the Millennium. This dome is beside the River Thames and on the opposite side, close to the global zero time line, is the Canary Wharf obelisk (see picture section).

The obelisk and the dome are both premier Brotherhood geometric symbols which draw in solar and cosmic energy. The man in charge of the Millennium Dome project was Peter Mandelson, the man dubbed ‘the Prince of Darkness’ who was forced to resign after revelations about his personal finances. It was Mandelson who was the Labour Party’s chief spin doctor when they introduced the red rose as the party symbol.

I am sure that in some way the Brotherhood plan to ‘flick’ time at this zero point at Greenwich to further scramble human consciousness and stimulate still more imbalance and conflict. The symbol for the Millennium Dome is a naked, long-legged woman reaching for the Sun as dawn breaks over the Greenwich Meridian. It has been dubbed ‘New Britannia’ and is said to represent ‘female icons from prehistory to the present day’. Icons or one icon, Queen Semiramis, under different names? The artist was paid £90,000 from the National Lottery fund for his efforts.

Playing with time is a major Brotherhood weapon against human consciousness. I am sure there were also originally 13 astrological signs too, and that the 13th was represented by the spider. This sign, I feel, was one which encompassed all the others - weaving together their various energies and I always see it as located in the centre of the astrological circle. 




read more at http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biggestsecret/biggestsecretbook/biggestsecret20.htm

Monday, April 30, 2012

Obama Uses Bin Laden Killing For Political Purposes. Does He Deserve The Credit? Should It Be Used In His Campaign?

Arianna Huffington rips Obama for Osama ad: ‘One of the most despicable things’ 
Published: 12:51 PM 04/30/2012




Who would have seen this coming? On Monday’s “CBS This Morning,” Huffington Post editor-in-chief Arianna Huffington condemned President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign for an ad questioning whether or not presumtive GOP nominee Mitt Romney would have killed Osama bin Laden.


The campaign ad features former President Bill Clinton applauding Obama, and takes what some say are Romney’s own words out of context to score political points.


The Romney campaign condemned the ad and Huffington agreed. “I agree with the Romney campaign,” she said. “Using the Osama bin Laden assassination, killing, the great news we had a year ago, in order to say basically that Obama did it and Romney may not have done it, which is really the — which is the message — I don’t think there should be an ad about that.


"I think it’s one thing to celebrate the fact that they did such a great job. It’s one thing to have an NBC special from the ‘Situation Room’ … all of that is perfectly legitimate. But to turn it into a campaign ad is one of the most despicable things you can do.”


 Huffington likened it to a 2008 campaign ad from Hillary Clinton questioning if Obama would have the wherewithal to react properly to a hypothetical emergency 3 a.m. phone call. “It’s the same thing Hillary Clinton did with the 3 a.m. call — you know, ‘You’re not ready to be commander-in-chief,’” she continued.


“It’s also what makes politicians and political leaders act irrationally when it comes to matters of war because they’re so afraid to be called wimps, that they make decisions, which are incredible destructive for the country. I’m sure the president would not have escalated in Afghanistan if he was not as concerned, as Democrats are, that Republicans are going to use not escalating against him in a campaign.”


 Huffington argued that the ad went beyond merely celebrating one of Obama’s chief accomplishments. “That’s not just what the ad does,” she said. “[The ad] quotes a snippet from Romney and uses that to imply that Romney would not has been as decisive. There’s no way to know whether Romney would have been as decisive.


To actually speculate that he wouldn’t be is to me not the way to run a campaign on either side.”


 Read more: Daily Caller.com




Obama strategy of taking credit for Osama bin Laden killing is risky, some observers say








President Obama has placed the killing of Osama bin Laden at the center of his re-election effort in a way that is drawing criticism for turning what he once described as an American victory into a partisan political asset.
Obama’s decision to send a Navy SEAL team deep inside Pakistan to kill bin Laden, the inspiration and ideologue behind the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, presents enormous political opportunity for a president, especially a Democratic one with no military experience.
But political analysts and Republican critics say Obama is taking a risk in claiming credit for something that as recently as his January State of the Union address he described as “a testament to the courage, selflessness and teamwork of America’s armed forces.”
In a series of videos and speeches leading up to the Wednesday anniversary of the raid, the Obama campaign, through high-profile proxies such as Vice President Biden and former president Bill Clinton, has made the president the star of the story. Biden and others have also suggested that Obama’s rival, the presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney, would not have pursued bin Laden with the same determination.
Read more at Washington Post




 "Ever since Vice President Joe Biden boiled down Obama's 2012 slogan to "bin Laden is dead, GM is alive," it has been clear that the embattled incumbent would not hesitate to use the May 2, 2011, Navy SEAL strike as a political weapon." Yahoo News



The Bush Administration, and the Killing of Osama bin Laden

by PEJMAN YOUSEFZADEH on MAY 5, 2011
David Mark, of Politico’s “Arena” asked whether George W. Bush should have accepted President Obama’s invitation to attend ceremonies at Ground Zero today. The question and possible answers should have been straightforward, but of course, some people chose to use the occasion for yet more Bush-bashing. My response can be found here. I trust that my impatience with some of the answers shines through.
The arguments continue to rage as to how much credit the Bush Administration should get for the process that led to bin Laden’s killing. I am sure that this observation will deeply upset those for whom hating George W. Bush is their raison d’être, but as Paul Miller notes, a considerable amount of credit should in fact go to the 43rd President and his team, as well as other predecessors of President Obama:
Covert action is authorized by a Presidential Finding. Findings are rare; more often, presidents sign Memoranda of Notification (MON) to further extend or modify an existing Finding. That is why to find the relevant finding behind the Abbottabad strike, we have to go all the way back to one signed in 1986 by President Ronald Reagan. The 1986 Finding describes the basic authorities for covert worldwide counterterrorism action by the military and intelligence community. The Finding was signed concurrently with the birth of the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center (CTC), and finally started the slow gears of American bureaucracy churning against terrorists across the globe. Reagan was the first to make fighting terrorism official U.S. policy. (See Steve Coll’s Ghost Wars).
President Bill Clinton signed a number of MONs further extending counterterrorism authorities, several specifically targeted at al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden, according to the 9/11 Commission Reportand Ghost Wars. The military and intelligence community designed several operations to either kill or capture bin Laden several times in the late 90s. Clinton was the first to make fighting al-Qaida U.S. policy.
President George W. Bush dramatically expanded the counterterrorism authorities with an expansive MON signed shortly after 9/11 (detailed in Woodward’s Bush At War). The authorities enabled intelligence operatives and special operations forces to embed with the Afghan Northern Alliance and overthrow the Taliban in 2001 (see Gary Schroen’s First In and Gary Berntsen’s Jawbreaker). They also eventually gave birth to the rumored drone program (here is a fascinating website that attempts to track the rumored done strikes). But the drones are relevant for Abbottabad not because of their missiles, but because of their cameras and sensors; they’ve helped build up years and years of data about militants which analysts have been able to mine for the smallest detail, crucial in the hunt for bin Laden.
Perhaps most directly relevant for the road to Abbottabad, Bush made a few key changes to the counterterrorism programs in 2008. Frustrated by years of stalemate, he expanded the authorized target list, began to approve missions without prior Pakistani approval, and also authorized ground incursions into Pakistan to pursue al-Qaida. (see Bob Woodward, Obama’s Wars, Chapter 1).Abbottabad was not the first widely-reported Navy SEAL incursion into Pakistan. Bush authorized a raid on the town of Angor Adda in September 2008 in pursuit of al-Qaida targets. The raid went poorly — it was undertaken during Ramadan, when civilians were awake and feasting at night-Pakistani officials lashed out, and ground incursions were halted. But the precedent was set.
Via InstaPundit, still more evidence that the Bush Administration should share in the credit:
As President Obama celebrates the signature national-security success of his tenure, he has a long list of people to thank. On the list: George W. Bush.
After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Bush waged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that have forged a military so skilled that it carried out a complicated covert raid with only a minor complication. Public tolerance for military operations over the past decade has shifted to the degree that a mission carried out deep inside a sovereign country has raised little domestic protest.
And a detention and interrogation system that Obama once condemned as contrary to American values produced one early lead that, years later, brought U.S. forces to the high-walled compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and a fatal encounter with an unarmed Osama bin Laden.
But the bridge connecting the two administrations has also led Obama to the same contested legal terrain over how to fight against stateless enemies and whether values should be sacrificed in the pursuit of security.
“We in the Obama administration absolutely benefitted from an enormous body of work and effort that went into understanding al-Qaeda and pursuing bin Laden,” said Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
All of these are inconvenient truths for those who want to believe that the plan to kill Osama bin Laden sprang unadorned from the brow of Barack Obama. But they are truths nonetheless. President Obama certainly deserves a significant share of credit for the fact that Osama bin Laden no longer walks the Earth. But so do a number of his predecessors, including and most especially his most recent predecessor.