INTERESTING INFORMATION CAME IN FROM ONE OF MY MOST RELIABLE SOURCES. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN RELEASED A WHILE AGO, BUT THERE HAS BEEN A DANCE OF LIES DELIBERATELY DELAYING THE TRUTH...
"a former special ops planner said that there is no way Obama could not have known what was going on in Benghazi.
He said those "flash" emergency messages from consulates, etc. aren't emails but come in another way, and there is someone standing by 24/7/365 to check such messages.
When received, the message would have been given to someone who would then have been ordered to deliver it to the president immediately - not to anyone else.
The implication of this is that the order to "stand down" had to come from POTUS - the only others authorized to give such an order are the VP and Secretary of State, in that order...
HERE IS SOME MORE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT...
...(and one would assume only if POTUS is not able/available to do so). If all this is true, seems to me that this is another symptom of Obama's being unable to make tough decisions unless he has months to think about it."
'STAND DOWN': U.S. HAD TWO DRONES, AC-130 GUNSHIP, AND TARGETS PAINTED IN BENGHAZI
by AWR HAWKINS 27 Oct 2012, 12:02 PM PDT 112
Reports indicate two drones and an AC-130 gunship were in the area when Benghazi was attacked, yet their resources were not used.
This runs completely against the current explanation coming out of the White House, which is that Obama did everything he could once he learned of the attack.
You'll remember that in the second presidential debate, Obama said that as "soon as I was aware the Benghazi consulate was being overrun, I was on the phone with my national security team." The not-so-subtle intimation is that Obama was stepping up to the protect the U.S. personnel who were in Libya. And in the wakes of their deaths, which weren't "optimal," we have been assured that stronger action wasn't taken stronger because those options weren't available.
Sec. of State Leon Panetta gave us another version this same excuse, saying: "The U.S. military did not get involved during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi last month because officials did not have enough information about what was going on before the attack was over."
There are three huge problems with the excuses Obama and Panetta are making.
1. It is now known that the U.S. had two drones in the area -- both of which were filming the attacks, sending back feeds in real time, and at least one of the drone may have been armed.
2. Reports also indicate a Specter gunship, probably an AC-130, was in the area for backup. The gunship could have swooped in and not only leveled the playing field in the match between 50 attackers vs a handful of security personnel, it could have thrown the attack decisively in favor of the security personnel.
3. The security personnel in Benghazi had painted a laser mark on the attackers outside the consulate. This mark would have made possible a response by the drones or the AC-130 routine had they been allowed to zero in on it. The member of the security team who was on the roof of the consulate, spraying machine gun fire down on the attackers, continually asked for backup from the AC-130. It never came.
Obama says he was doing everything he could, and Panetta says we didn't react more strongly because we weren't sure what was going on. Yet we now know two drones were sending back video of the attack in real time, and at least one of those drones may have been armed. We also know a massive AC-130 gunship could have been used for backup as well, but it was not. And we know that security was begging for backup and even marking targets with lasers for the drones and/or gunship so they could make quick work of the attackers.
Yet Obama chose not to respond, and that's the bottom line.
SOURCE: http://www.breitbart.com
SOURCE: WHEREABOUTS UNKNOWN OF ATTACKERS RELEASED TO LIBYA BY CIA
by AWR HAWKINS 27 Oct 2012, 2:04 PM PDT
As a guest on Pennsylvania's Michael Smerconish Program on Oct 26, Obama spoke of the Benghazi attack:
What happened in a Benghazi was a tragedy. We're investigating exactly what happened. I take full responsibility for the fact that I send these folks into harm's way and I want to make sure they're always safe.
He added:
When that doesn't happen -- uhhhh -- we will figure out what happened and make sure it doesn't happen again. But my biggest priority right now is bringing those folks to justice, and I think the American people have seen that's a commitment I always keep.
Think about that. Obama said, "My biggest priority right now is bringing those folks to justice, and I think the American people have seen that's a commitment I always keep." Yet "according to a source on the ground at the time of the attack," Obama has not kept this promise. Rather, when the CIA captured three of the attackers, they were ordered to release them to Libyan authorities and are now unaware of their whereabouts.
Who ordered the CIA to hand the three attackers over to Libya?
CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood makes one thing clear -- the CIA didn't do it: "We can say with confidence that the Agency reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible time in Benghazi. No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need, [and] claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate."
The CIA called for military support in Benghazi more than once on Sept 11. Those calls were not simply ignored, they were denied.
SOURCE: http://www.breitbart.com
No comments:
Post a Comment