Ad

Showing posts with label federal government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label federal government. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Obama's Misuse of His Power as President of the United States on Gun Control



Basis in U.S. Constitution

U.S. presidents have issued executive orders since 1785. Although there is no Constitutional provision or statute that explicitly permits executive orders, there is a vague grant of "executive power" given in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, and furthered by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 5. Most Executive Orders use these Constitutional reasonings as the authorization allowing for their issuance to be justified as part of the President's sworn duties, the intent being to help direct officers of the U.S. Executive carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office

Regarding the article below...
  • multi-step program on gun control
  • likely reinstatement of an assault weapons ban that expired in 2004.
  • tracking the sale and movement of weapons via a national database
  • stiffer checks on the mental health of prospective gun buyers
  • Obama could issue orders to improve background checks on gun buyers, ban certain gun imports and bolster oversight of dealers
  • Other executive orders could improve information sharing among law enforcement authorities about illegal gun purchases, and maintain data on gun sales for longer periods
  • stores in the four U.S. states bordering Mexico to send a notice to federal law enforcement whenever someone buys two or more of a certain kind of high-caliber, semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine


Biden says Obama could use executive orders to restrict guns

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden (R) speaks to representatives of gun safety and gun violence victims' groups in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House complex in Washington, January 9, 2013. President Barack Obama is 'determined to take action' against gun violence and is weighing possible executive orders aimed preventing further attacks like last month's shooting massacre at a Connecticut elementary school, Biden said on Wednesday. Also pictured is U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (2nd L). REUTERS-Larry Downing

WASHINGTON | Wed Jan 9, 2013 6:23pm EST

(Reuters) - Vice President Joe Biden said on Wednesday the White House is determined to act quickly to curb gun violence and will explore all avenues - including executive orders that would not require approval by Congress - to try to prevent incidents like last month's massacre at a Connecticut school.
Kicking off a series of meetings on gun violence, Biden said the administration would work with gun-control advocates and gun-rights supporters to build a consensus on restrictions. But he made clear that President Barack Obama is prepared to act on his own if necessary.

"We are not going to get caught up in the notion that unless we can do everything, we're going to do nothing. It's critically important that we act," said Biden, who will meet on Thursday with pro-gun groups including the National Rifle Association, which claims 4 million members and is the gun lobby's most powerful organization.

Biden, whose panel was formed after 20 schoolchildren and six adults were killed on December 14 by a gunman at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, has been ordered by Obama to come up with policy proposals on guns by the end of January.

The vice president said there was a consensus on "three or four or five" steps regarding gun safety, but did not specify what they were.

"There are executive orders, executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet," Biden said, adding that Obama is conferring with Attorney General Eric Holder on potential action.

Biden's group is expected to recommend to Congress the reinstatement of an assault weapons ban that expired in 2004.

The Washington Post has reported the group also will ask Congress for broad restrictions that include tracking the sale and movement of weapons via a national database, and stiffer checks on the mental health of prospective gun buyers.

During his daily briefing, White House spokesman Jay Carney declined to discuss any action Obama might take on his own on guns. "Those decisions haven't been made," Carney said.

The Connecticut school shootings galvanized activists on both sides of the gun-control issue. In Washington and across the nation, the slayings inspired new calls for more restrictive gun laws and led gun-rights advocates to mobilize in opposition.

Obama promised to put gun control at the top of his agenda after he begins his second term on January 20, but the issue will have to compete with a crush of other priorities including a looming budget confrontation with congressional Republicans.

'DETERMINED TO TAKE ACTION'

There have been other pushes for gun control in recent years, but such efforts were typically blocked by the influential gun lobby, which enjoys widespread support among Republicans and significant backing among Democrats as well.

But now, "the president and I are determined to take action," Biden said at Wednesday's meeting with gun violence victims and gun-control advocates.

"This is not an exercise in photo opportunities or just getting to ask you all what your opinions are. We're reaching out to all parties on whatever side of the debate you fall," he said.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc, the largest U.S. gun seller, also will participate in Thursday's White House meetings. Wal-Mart reversed its initial decision not to send anyone to the Biden gathering to share the company's position.

"We underestimated the expectation to attend the meeting on Thursday in person, so we are sending an appropriate representative to participate," spokesman David Tovar said.

Dan Gross, president of the Brady Campaign to End Gun Violence, attended Wednesday's meeting and told reporters there was broad consensus on strengthening background checks and a general convergence of ideas on many other restrictions.

"What the gun lobby is trying to do is drag ... the American public down into the same old political debate," Gross said.

Even without action by Congress, Obama could issue orders to improve background checks on gun buyers, ban certain gun imports and bolster oversight of dealers. Other executive orders could improve information sharing among law enforcement authorities about illegal gun purchases, and maintain data on gun sales for longer periods.

Obama has said he believes most Americans support the reinstatement of a ban on the sale of military-style assault weapons, barring the sale of high-capacity ammunition clips, and a law requiring background checks on buyers before all gun purchases.

It is unclear whether any of those measures will have more support in Congress after the Connecticut massacre than they did after previous mass shootings.

With the federal outcome uncertain, some states are taking action on their own. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo pledged to enact the country's strictest assault weapons ban and outlaw all high-capacity magazines.

"Gun violence has been on a rampage as we know firsthand and we know painfully," Cuomo said on Wednesday in his annual State of the State address, committing New York to leading the country in enacting new gun control laws. "We must stop the madness, my friends."

In neighboring Connecticut, Governor Dannel Malloy urged U.S. lawmakers to tighten federal gun control measures in response to the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

"As long as weapons continue to travel up and down (interstate highway) I-95, what is available for sale in Florida or Virginia can have devastating consequences here in Connecticut," said Malloy, who paused and fought back tears, his voice cracking, when discussing the tragedy at Sandy Hook.

A federal appeals court signaled on Wednesday it is prepared to uphold one of the few gun control measures put forward so far by the Obama administration - a regulation designed to detect the sale of semi-automatic rifles to Mexican drug cartels.

Gun retailers and manufacturers, including a trade group based in Newtown, said the rule is burdensome and violates federal law.

The measure requires stores in the four U.S. states bordering Mexico to send a notice to federal law enforcement whenever someone buys two or more of a certain kind of high-caliber, semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine.

The court is expected to rule on the case within the next few months. During a hearing on Wednesday, the court's three judges repeatedly questioned whether the rule created too much extra work for gun sellers and manufacturers.

In Colorado, prosecutors ended their pre-trial case against accused movie house gunman James Holmes by showing photos he took of himself by cellphone, posing with firearms and body armor.

The photos capped three days of hearings in which prosecutors laid out their case for putting him on trial. Defense lawyers declined to present evidence or witnesses of their own.

The onetime neuroscience doctoral student is charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and attempted murder for the 12 people slain and dozens of others wounded in the Denver suburb of Aurora in a July shooting attack.

(Additional reporting by David Ingram, Roberta Rampton, Daniel Trotta, Hilary Russ and Keith Coffman; Editing by David Lindsey and Cynthia Osterman)

Friday, August 24, 2012

National Security Leaks.

Feinstein Comments on National Security Leaks Emerge as Campaign Issue

gty barbara feinstein dm 120316 wblog Feinstein Comments on National Security Leaks Emerge as Campaign Issue
Scott J. Ferrell/Congressional Quarterly/Getty Images

In remarks at the World Affairs Council, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, expressed concern Monday about leaks of national security information, saying, “The White House has to understand that some of this is coming from its ranks. I don’t know specifically where, but I think they have to begin to understand that and do something about it.”

Referring to David Sanger’s book “Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power,” Feinstein said, “There’s one book they can read and they’ll see it very clearly. And I think that should be the case.”

Feinstein said that “what the president actually knows about this is difficult because with respect to intelligence he is in a bubble. He has his daily brief, called the PDB, the President’s Daily Brief, early every morning. And so he gets briefing from intelligence I don’t believe for a moment that he goes out and talks about it, I don’t believe the briefers go out and talk about it, but who knows who else. And I think that the importance of this has to be really set by the president himself. And hopefully he will do it, and I think he’ll most likely read the book and see it himself.”

Referring to David Sanger’s book
“Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars
and Surprising Use of American Power,”
Feinstein said, “There’s one book they
can read and they’ll see it very clearly.
And I think that should be the case.”



Asked for more detail about the senator’s comments, a Feinstein aide says that when she said the leaks were “coming from its ranks,” the senator was referring to the Obama administration — the federal government — in general, not specifically individuals in the White House. The aide also said that the senator does not know who the leakers were; she was assuming.

read more here: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/democratic-senators-comments-on-national-security-leaks-emerge-as-campaign-issue-3/

Who’s leaking the White House’s classified national security information?

Kill lists for drone strikes personally ticked off by President Barack Obama, a terrorist bomb plot thwarted by a brave double agent, juicy details about the raid that killed Osama bin Laden – all leaked and now all fuelling a raging political brouhaha in this election year.

Presidents decry leaks, and Mr. Obama is no exception. “The notion that my White House would purposely release classified national security information is offensive,” Mr. Obama claimed after the most recent leak revealed another supposedly secret cyber-attack on Iran.

Opponents weren’t persuaded. “It’s obvious on its face that this information came from individuals who are in the administration.” said Sen. John McCain as the ‘leaks’ furor dominated the Sunday talk shows. “The president may not have done it himself, but the president certainly is responsible as commander in chief.”


Skillful, willful leaking has long
been part of the dark art of
enhancing presidential prowess.

Skillful, willful leaking has long been part of the dark art of enhancing presidential prowess. And – especially with those secrets so closely held that only a vanishingly few people know them – the likelihood of accidental or inadvertent disclosure is tiny.

Critics accuse the president – or loyal aides close to him – of deliberately leaking to boost Mr. Obama’s image as being even tougher, and more effective, at waging war on terrorists than his predecessor, George W. Bush. But those leaks risk the lives of agents in the field and make future and on-going covert operations more difficult.

Even as all sides claimed they only wanted to stop the leaks and haul the leakers before the courts, a partisan battle was under way. “The White House ... claimed that my criticism of the Administration’s involvement in, and culpability for, leaks of sensitive and classified information is ‘grossly irresponsible.’ No, what is grossly irresponsible is U.S. officials divulging some of the most highly classified programs involving the most important national security priorities facing our nation today,” said Sen. McCain, who lost to Mr. Obama in the 2008 presidential elections.

One revealing anecdote recently emerged about the bin Laden raid and high-level willingness to keeping secrets when political advantage is in play. According to then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who served in both the Bush and Obama administrations, those who watched the raid with the President agreed.

“In the Situation Room, we all agreed that we would not release any operational details from the effort to take out bin Laden. That all fell apart on Monday, the next day,” Mr. Gates said. It has since been leaked that the following day, Mr. Gates confronted one of Mr. Obama’s closest aides and suggested a new communications policy, consisting of “Shut the f–– up!”
In the current case, Mr. Obama’s embattled Attorney General Eric Holder has named two Justice Department prosecutors to probe the leaks.

“In the Situation Room, we all
agreed that we would not release
any operational details from the
effort to take out bin Laden. That
all fell apart on Monday, the next
day,” Mr. Gates said.

That, too, is coming under fire for being inadequate.

“Can you have the U.S. attorney assigned through the Attorney General to investigate something that is clearly going to be at the most senior levels of all of the executive branch – DOD (Department of Defense) and FBI, the attorney general’s office and even the president. I mean, some of the leaks – and the public leaks– are self-described aides or people who were in the Situation Room. That’s a pretty small but pretty important group of people,” said Rep. Mike Rogers, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

Sen. McCain was blunter. “Mr. Holder’s credibility with Congress is – there is none,” he said, adding that when a CIA agent Valerie Plame was outed during the Bush administration, a special independent counsel was appointed to investigate and – eventually – a top aide to former Vice President Dick Cheney went to prison.

The current leaks about kill lists for drone strikes and cyber warfare and double-agents deep inside al-Qaeda’s bomb-making cell in Yemen constitute the “most egregious breach of intelligence in anybody’s memory, (and) certainly requires a special counsel who is completely independent,” he said.

source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/worldview/whos-leaking-the-white-houses-classified-national-security-information/article4246577/

Friday, April 8, 2011

Why is Congress being paid for not meeting a deadline?


Federal government shutdown could see 800,000 staff suspended

Barack Obama and John Boehner in budget talks to secure last-minute deal amid threat of widespread disruption to services  http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/08/federal-government-shutdown-obama-boehner

OF COURSE THIS IS ESSENTIAL!!!!

Government shutdown won't halt DC's Cherry Blossom parade

Comments  
By Laura Bly, USA TODAY
The National Cherry Blossom Festival Parade will go on as scheduled Saturday, even if last-minute budget negotiations fail and the federal government shuts down at midnight.

By Laura Bly/USAT
Parade spokeswoman Danielle Piacente told the Associated Press that since part of the original parade route on Constitution Avenue is under National Park juridiction, if there is a government shutdown, the parade will run Saturday morning on Constitution from 7th Street to 14th Street to avoid crossing into Park Service territory. Piacente says D.C. police would provide extra support if U.S. Park Police aren't available.

HERE IS THE RUNDOWN ...
With less than 24 hours left until a likely federal government shutdown, the city is full of anxiety about how Congress' squabbling will put a crimp in our daily routines. What can you expect living in a town which is at the total whim of the constantly bickering lawmakers in Congress? Behold, an encyclopedic guide to the shutdown's effect on the District!
Anti-Deficiency Act: Under this law, passed in 1884 and revised in 1950, "the expenditure of funds by any branch of the Federal government unless those funds have been appropriated by Congress" are illegal. In modern layman's terms, it means that it's against the law for the hundreds of thousands of federal workers who would be forced into a furlough to check their email or voicemails during the disruption. (Of course, no one's ever been prosecuted for violating it.)
Department of [Insert City Service Here]: Wondering whether you'll be able to get a permit from the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, renew your driver's license at the Department of Motor Vehicles or contact the Office of Motion Picture Development? Nope, nope and nope. But there are District agencies that will be up and running -- check this list for who's working and who isn't.
Jury Duty: As we noted yesterday, the city's courts will still be open, so those of you who are supposed to show up at Moultrie for jury duty will still be expected to do so.
Libraries: Thinking this weekend might have been a good time to check out the District's sparkly new libraries in Petworth, Tenleytown and Shaw? No dice, they'll all be closed -- though you could always try your luck with neighboring jurisdictions' book depositories, who would welcome you in with open arms.
National Mall: During the last shutdown in 1995, a large portion of the monuments around the Mall were closed -- and the National Parks Conservation Association says that the Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson, and others will be closed again this time. But the Mall itself should remain open, so at least Sunday's Kite Festival could conceivably go on as planned.
Smithsonian: The Institution, whose attractions were estimated to bring in 3.8 million visitors this month, would be closed down. (On the plus side: fewer chances to be enraged by 19th century breasts.)
Trash: Yes, city pickup will be suspended for a week -- so make good use of those Supercans , and do your neighbors a favor and try to keep it from piling up in the District's gutters. Or, you know, just drop it off at John Boehner's place.
UDC: The District's public schools might still be handing out knowledge and lunches, but classes at the city's university will cease, potentially putting graduation in doubt for students, should a shutdown last for any extended period of time.
Zoo: Nope, no lion cubs for anyone, which is just wrong. Come on, Congress, cut us a break here.

Government Shutdown Would Delay Tax Refunds



The head of the IRS conceded Wednesday that a federal government shutdown -- threatened for as early as 12:01 a.m. Saturday morning -- would delay refunds for taxpayers who file their returns on paper rather than electronically.

'Non-Essential' Workers: Back Away from the Blackberry

Friday, April 8, 2011 | 9:15 a.m.

As the looming threat of a government shutdowninches nearer, federal agencies are issuing a strict array of directives for how "non-essential" employees should conduct themselves in the event of a shutdown. In short: Don't work—don't even think about working. This includes "telework" or logging on to your e-mail account, receiving or sending text-messages, phone calls or voicemails even at home. A House Administration Committee memo advises reps to confiscate their staff's office-issued BlackBerry phones. Another House memo warns that "working in any way during a period of furlough (even as a volunteer) is grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment." Fired for texting?
Politico's Mike Allen describes the directives as "Orwellian" but it's not clear how seriously any of theestimated 1 million "non essential" employees are taking the marching orders. "Workers who may be furloughed wonder who will know if they sneak a peek and read an email or two," writes Margaret Rockat Mobiledia. "Others are betting that their bosses will go soft on enforcing the policy, by not taking the full measures to round up all the devices."

IF THEY DON'T GET A DEAL DONE BY MIDNIGHT, INSTEAD OF LEAVING THE "NON-ESSENTIAL" GOVERNMENT WORKERS AND/OR THOSE WHO ARE FIGHTING FOR OUR COUNTRY WITHOUT ANY WAY TO PAY THEIR BILLS, WHY NOT RE-CLASSIFY "NON-ESSENTIAL" TO INCLUDE CONGRESS, WHO WASTE MORE MONEY THAN ANYONE IN THE COUNTRY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 
WHY DO THEY GET PAID?  THEY ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOBS AND MAYBE IF THEY DIDN'T GET PAID IF THEY DIDN'T MAKE THEIR DEADLINE, MAYBE THEY WOULD MAKE THINGS NICE WITH EACH OTHER AND ACTUALLY MAKE A REALISTIC GOAL.