Ad

Showing posts with label WORK. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WORK. Show all posts

Monday, December 10, 2012

Crazy Chaos In China. Niburu. Suicide. NASA. December 21, 2012

Chileans Don't Want to Work During "End of the World"
Superstitions about what could happen on December 21st seem to be big in the South American nation of Chile. In a telephone survey conducted in that country by the website, Trabajando.com , 24 percent of respondents said that they will ask their employers for the day off on December 21st, with almost half of these respondents saying that they will do so because they are "very superstitious." The 21st of December marks the end of a 5,000 year long period of the Mayan Calendar, known as the 13th Baktun. Some western mystics have said that this date represents "the end of the world," while others describe it as a period of renewal, or as a chance to connect with Mother Earth. ABC

China fears end of the world is nigh

China is taking the date of December 21 - the day the world is due to end - seriously, with panic buying of candles sweeping through counties. Malcolm Moore reports.
China fears end of the world is nigh
Lu Zhenghai began building the 65ft ship in 2010 and spent his life savings of £100,000 to build the ark for 20 people.  Photo: REX FEATURES




China's most famous book of prophecies, the 7th century Tui Bei Tu, makes no direct mention of the end of the world.

But in Sichuan province, panic buying of candles has swept through two counties in the fear that an ancient Mayan prediction that the world will end on December 21 proves to be true.

"Candles are selling by the hundreds, with buyers constantly coming to the market. Many stores have run out," said Huang Zhaoli, a shopper at the Neijing Wholesale Market, to the West China City Daily newspaper.

Mr Li, the owner of the Guangfa grocery store in Chengdu, added: "Lots of people have been buying candles recently. At first, we had no idea why. But then we heard someone muttering about the continuous darkness".
The source of the panic was traced to a post on Sina Weibo, China's version of Twitter, predicting that there will be three days of darkness when the apocalypse arrives.



China's most famous book of prophecies, the 7th century Tui Bei Tu, makes no direct mention of the end of the world.
But in Sichuan province, panic buying of candles has swept through two counties in the fear that an ancient Mayan prediction that the world will end on December 21 proves to be true.
"Candles are selling by the hundreds, with buyers constantly coming to the market. Many stores have run out," said Huang Zhaoli, a shopper at the Neijing Wholesale Market, to the West China City Daily newspaper.
Mr Li, the owner of the Guangfa grocery store in Chengdu, added: "Lots of people have been buying candles recently. At first, we had no idea why. But then we heard someone muttering about the continuous darkness".
The source of the panic was traced to a post on Sina Weibo, China'sversion of Twitter, predicting that there will be three days of darkness when the apocalypse arrives.


Since the beginning of December, the word "Mayans" has trended on Weibo as millions of normally phlegmatic Chinese speculate that the end is nigh. "If the Mayans are right, I won’t pay my credit card bill," was one popular post.
In Shanghai, the police have had to issue a public warning about doomsday. "The end of the world is a rumour," the police said, in an internet post. "Do not believe it and do not be swindled".
A spokesman said they had handled 25 apocalypse-related cases in one 24-hour stretch. Most of the scam artists took advantage of credulous pensioners, encouraging them to hand over their savings for one last act of charity.
In Nanjing, a 54-year-old university professor's wife took out a £100,000 mortgage on her £300,000 home, saying she would donate the money to underprivileged children, saying she hoped to "do something meaningful before the world ended".
Last month, a man in the far west province of Xinjiang made news when he spent his life savings of £100,000 to build an ark for 20 people.
Lu Zhenghai began building the 65ft ship in 2010. "When the time comes, everyone can take refuge in it." However, as the deadline approaches, Mr Lu has reportedly run out of cash to finish the boat.
He said if the apocalypse failed to materialise, he would use the boat to take tourists on sightseeing tours.
In Chengdu, a web company has given its workers a tongue-in-cheek two-day break on Dec 19 and 20. "We suggest you take advantage of this 'final' time to spend more time with your closest family. We wish everyone a meaningful doomsday," it said.
China has no history of preoccupation with the apocalypse, and the current wave of paranoia can be traced to the 2009 Hollywood disaster film "2012". While the movie received a tepid welcome elsewhere, it was a smash hit in China, as viewers were seduced by a plot that saw the Chinese military build arks to save humanity.
Lu Jiehua, a professor with the Department of Sociology at Peking University, told the Global Times, meanwhile, that the paranoia reflects a general anxiety running through Chinese society.
"This panic buying [in Sichuan] not only shows people's fear of an upcoming apocalypse, but also reflects their sense of uncertainty toward life and society," he said. TELEGRAPH

2012 Prophecies Sparking Real Fears, Suicide Warnings



"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to be around when the world ends," he said. "Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world." NATGEO
Doomsday 2012 Fears: Thousands Invest in Bunkers; Some Consider Suicide

The countdown to the supposed "Mayan apocalypse" some are saying could hit Dec. 21 of this year has begun and some people are already thinking of taking drastic measures in order to prepare for end-of-the-world events.

David Morrison, senior scientist at the NASA Astrobiology Institute, shared with the Daily Mail that he receives 10 emails a day from people who are "seriously, seriously upset" about the prospect of a coming apocalypse.

He shared of a message from a woman in Denmark who wrote: "Mother of one daughter and another coming. Yesterday I was considering killing myself, the baby in my stomach and my beloved two-year-old daughter before December 2012 for fear of having to experience the Earth’s destruction."

A 13-year-old American reportedly wrote: "I am considering suicide. I am scared to tears . . . I don’t want to live any more, I deserve an explanation."

These fears are based in large part on a 5,125-year-old calendar by the Mayans, who are said to have been exceptionally gifted in astronomy. The calendar ends Dec. 21, 2012, and there has been a lot of discussion among researchers and the public about what this abrupt end actually means.

An ancient stone tablet discovered at ruins in Tortuguero, southern Mexico, in the 1960s, talked of a Mayan god of war and creation who would "descend from the sky on the appointed day," which added further fuel to doomsday theories. Some researchers, however, insist that there is no concrete evidence to suggest the prophecy is referring to the destruction of Earth.


"There's no real prophesy that says this is going to be the end of the world," Christopher Powell, an archeologist who studies Mayan culture, shared with ABC News. "Not from the Mayan ruins, anyway."


NASA has stated that it has received more than 5,000 questions from people about possible end-of-the-world scenarios, the Daily Mail article shared, revealing even more cases of people asking whether they should go ahead and kill themselves and their loved ones rather than face what Dec. 21 may have in store.

Talk potential catastrophes and widespread public fear have encouraged Californian businessman Robert Vicino to start a project building luxury bankers in secret locations around the world. The shelters are sold for $10,000 per person, according to the official website of the project, named Vivos.

Although it features a section discussing end-of-the-world prophecies and has a "countdown" clock that counts down the days, hours, minutes and seconds until Dec. 21, 2012, Vivos is not focused exclusively on the Mayan apocalypse. It advertises that its shelters can be used for a great number of disasters that may hit the planet, ranging from natural catastrophes like solar flares and global tsunamis, to man-made threats such as terrorism and anarchy.

Vicino shared with the Daily Mail that more than 5,000 Americans have already booked their places, and they are expanding operations into Europe. One such man who has reserved a spot, Steve Cramer, said: "We’re not crazy people: these are fearful times. My family wants to survive. You have to be prepared."

Another member, Jason Hodge, a father of four, described his decision as an "investment in life."

"I want to make sure I have a place I can take me and my family if that worst-case scenario were to happen," he explained.

From the many theories of what may happen on the Mayan date, SPACE.com is said to have shared reports of a rogue planet called "Nibiru" that is headed for Earth, and according to Nancy Lieder, a self-proclaimed Nibiru expert who claims she is in contact with aliens from Zeta Reticuli, Nibiru will strike Earth on Dec. 21, 2012.

NASA representative, Don Yeomans, manager of NASA's Near-Earth Object program office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., debunked Lieder's claims and told SPACE.com that "Nibiru is ridiculous because it doesn't exist -- it never existed as anything other than a figment of the imagination by pseudo-scientists who don't seem bothered by a complete lack of evidence."

"There are no known near-Earth objects in 2012 that present a credible risk to Earth," Yeomans concluded.

James Beverley, a professor of Christian thought and ethics at Toronto's Tyndale University College & Seminary, explained that apocalypse theories associated with the Maya were often misinformed New Age theories. He said they lack grounding in Mayan anthropology or religious studies, and that such theories assume a future that is God’s alone to know.

"The Bible tells us that the world as we know it will end sometime, but Jesus also tells us that no one knows the hour," Beverley said. "So, the 2012 prediction deserves no respect, though people who truly believe this theory should be treated with love."

Family Radio Stations, Inc. founder Harold Camping predicted the end of the world incorrectly on several occasions. He predicted the world would end in 1994, then said that the rapture would occur May 21, 2011, and his latest prediction was an Oct. 2011 rapture.

As a result, many believers sold their homes and gave up their wealth to fund campaigns advertising the Christian broadcaster's claims. They bought t-shirts and other merchandise and stood on street corners telling of the upcoming rapture.

Steven L. Sherman, author of The Revelation of Christ: Understanding the Apocalypsesaid such things happen when people are not "Bible literate."

To Sherman, people who believe the Mayan calendar predicts the end of days believe in paganism. "I don't put any credence in it, but Christians have to be prepared for persecution one day," he concluded.

Read more at GC


Saturday, April 14, 2012

Attacking "Stay-At-Home Moms"? Stay-at-home moms are worth $112,000, study says...

Hilary Beth Rosen, an American lobbyist and Democratic pundit has made a HUGE mistake by saying that stay-at-home moms don't know what it's like to work, or that they don't have a job and therefore don't work.  Firstly, listen to the words from the mouth of Hilary Rosen...




Insulting?  Absolutely!  In fact, it brings question to the reality that Hilary Rosen lives in.  Is SHE in touch with the real lives of the American people?  What makes her an expert on whether or not women who stay-at-home as mothers actually "work" or have a "job"?  


Take a look at the article below...



Ann Romney flap: Stay-at-home moms are worth $112,000, study says

What is a stay-at-home mom worth?
We all know a mother's work is never done. Salary.com -- a salary compensation website -- puts a price tag on it. (Salary.com / April 13, 2012)



Ann Romney didn't draw a salary when she was a stay-at-home mom raising five boys. But if she had, she'd have pulled in more than $112,000 a year in today's dollars, suggests a popular new study.
Each year, Salary.com asks thousands of stay-at-home moms to complete a detailed survey about how they spend their days managing a household and raising children. The popular website dedicated to salary compensation issues then puts a price tag on all that cooking, cleaning, chauffeuring, laundry-doing ....
This year's study says the average stay-at-home mom's compensation would total $112,962 a year. (Romney would probably earn more because she was raising a larger-than-usual family of five boys.)
If you've tuned into media pundits this week, you'd think that the country is actually debating the value of a stay-at-home mom's work after Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen put her foot in her mouth by saying Ann Romney "never worked a day in her life" because she stayed home raising the five kids she shares with Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney.
"That's laughable," said Aaron Gouevia, a content manager at Salary.com. "Moms absolutely have value. They work -- and work a lot."
Meanwhile, Ann Crittenden, author of "The Price of Motherhood," said she was especially saddened that a woman set off the controversy pitting working women against stay-at-home moms. "Women can't seem to stop being judgmental of each other, which is a tragedy because 'divided you shall be conquered,'" she told The Times.
Attacked: Ann Romney, who suffers from multiple sclerosis and has beaten breast cancer, argued she has experienced hard work bringing up her sons
Attacked: Ann Romney, who suffers from multiple sclerosis and has beaten breast cancer, argued she has experienced hard work bringing up her sons


Crittenden said she believes Rosen actually does value stay-at-home moms, but that her poorly chosen words suggested otherwise.
Nonetheless, the flap speaks to the disjointed attitude Americans have toward stay-at-home moms, Crittenden said. By turns, stay-at-home moms are put on a pedestal for doing the "world's most important job" and then they are derided for "just" taking care of the kids.
Crittenden suggested that instead of bickering over Rosen's comments, Republicans and Democrats can show their support for stay-at-home moms by making it easier for women to choose that route. (For many women, forgoing that salary is simply not an option.)
Campaigning: Mitt and Ann Romney, pictured on March 20 in Schaumburg, Illinois, were criticised for having a warped understanding of women's economic concerns
Campaigning: Mitt and Ann Romney, pictured on March 20 in Schaumburg, Illinois, were criticised for having a warped understanding of women's economic concerns


But there was one bright spot in this week's controversy, author Leslie Morgan Steiner told The Times.
"Six years ago, when I was writing 'Mommy Wars,' moms understood in two seconds what the book was about. But when I told men I was researching a book on tensions between working and stay-at-home moms, they would say, 'Huh, could you write a whole book about THAT?'
"Today, men I've talked to and men responding to the comments online seem equally incensed that anyone would suggest that raising five children is not 'work,' " she said. "We've come a long way in the mommy wars if men now fully understand how very hard motherhood is."

SOURCE: LA TIMES
SECOND SOURCE: DAILY MAIL



Would Hilary Rosen Have Criticized Stay-at-Home Dads as Never Having Worked?


It's good that Hilary Rosen apologized for her comments that Ann Romney, who chose to be a stay-at-home mom to raise her five boys, had 'never worked a day in her life.' It took a day for Rosen to finally acknowledge that her comments were unhelpful, but she finally said, "I apologize to Ann Romney and anyone else who was offended."
Now, I am opposed to the culture of offense where people look to be offended by some public comment. We all need to chill a little and stop pouncing on each other. People can express their opinions without it always leading to a culture war. But Rosen's comments are different and I'm saying that not as someone running for Congress but as someone who has counseled thousands of women, many of them stay-at-home moms.
Too many have told me that they already feel inferior. Their husbands get to go out of the house and have a change of scenery. They get paid for their work and therefore often feel more appreciated and have greater control of the family's finances and spending. Many stay-at-home moms still have to ask their husbands for money or are degradingly given allowances for the families needs, something I have always railed against. With rare exceptions, a couple's money should be equally pooled, as should most things in marriage. But too many husbands feel that they are the breadwinners and their wives have not earned their share of the family income. So why should they have equal say in how it is spent?
Not that Rosen doesn't have any validity to her points, either. Indeed, she is correct. Many moms would choose to be at home, but they can't. The family is desperate for the second income. But even so, Rosen's unnecessarily demeaning comments against stay-at-home mothers -- and I'm happy to believe her that she never intended her remarks to be insulting -- reinforce a negative stereotype that mothers who are at home are not pulling their weight or earning their fair share.
Let's turn the tables for a moment. There is a growing movement on the part of husbands to be stay-at-home dads while their wives go out and earn the bacon (I apologize for the deep offense I have now no doubt caused my Jewish readers). A 2008 US Census publication puts the number of married fathers who work in the home as their children's primary caregivers at approximately 140,000. Now, would Rosen have said the same thing about these men, that they never worked a single day in their lives, or would she, as have so many others, praised them for their maternal role in putting their children first? Would she have lauded their ability to get beyond the traditional macho-man role and prioritizing their family even before their careers? So if Rosen is going to rail against a war against women, then let's agree that a gender bias that praises men who put their kids first but punishes women for the same is an unfair assault in that battle.
For the record, I am actually an advocate of women having a profession even when they are near full-time mothers. It constitutes advice I often give unhappy wives who come to me for counseling. Get out of the house more and develop your career. If you don't need the money, volunteer for charity.
My wife and I are blessed with nine children. But my wife has always worked alongside me in everything I have done. And I have raised my six daughters to do all the things that I have done with my boys.
Women are the equal of men in all ability and professionalism and I believe in encouraging our daughters to be both moms and professionals, simply because human beings seek the dignity that comes with both.
We acknowledge, on the one hand, that we are links in a higher chain of existence and raise our children to continue that chain. But in addition, we are people in our own right and seek the maximum development of our individualism irrespective of our position in a family.
Still, this is my opinion. Others may disagree. And that's the whole point of the need for Rosen's apology. Rosen is a political consultant with two kids. G-d bless her. It's beautiful that she has chosen to do both. But it is not for her to judge other people's choices. Besides, if Rosen had had five kids rather than two -- and Mormons, like Jews, have large families -- she might have found it slightly more challenging to sustain her career.
The point is that everyone contributes in their own way, and it's time for us to all stop assailing and judging each other. Not only is it important to reverse the culture of taking offense, it's also important to curb a culture that gives it, too.
SOURCE: HUFFINGTON POST
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, HERE IS SOME INFORMATION THAT MANY OF YOU MAY BE LOOKING FOR IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE ROMNEYS...

Ann Romney's Career Choice: 'No Nannies' For Mother, Says Source

By HOWARD KOPLOWITZ: Subscribe to Howard's 
April 12, 2012 6:05 PM EDT
Ann Romney had the means to hire help in raising her five sons, but she went about it the way the average American mother would -- with no assistance at all.
According to a source familiar with the family, Ann Romney did not tap into her family's vast wealth in raising Tagg, Matt, Josh, Ben and Craig while Mitt toiled away at the Boston Consulting Group and Bain Capital in the 1970s and 1980s.

(Photo: Facebook)
Ann Romney had the means to hire help in raising her five children, but she went about rearing the kids the way the average American would - with no assistance at all.

"No nannies," said the source, who requested anonymity.
A poster on the liberal website Daily Kos speculated that Ann Romney had help raising the kids, claiming the Romneys had five housekeepers in 2010.
"If they had that much help in 2010 it is hard to imagine that Ann Romney raised her 5 children without any outside assistance, wouldn't you agree?" Daily Kos user jbiggs asked.
But the poster posed the question without offering any evidence to back up his assertion.
Romney's days as a housewife have been scrutinized since Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen said Wednesday night on CNN that Romney "has never worked a day in her life."
Romney and stay-at-home moms everywhere took offense to Rosen's remarks for suggesting raising children wasn't work.
"I made a choice to stay home and raise five boys. Believe me, it was hard work," Ann Romney tweeted.
Rosen has since apologized for her comment, but she also said Romney had the luxury of staying home when the average American mother today can't afford to do so.
"@AnnDRomney I am raising children too. But most young American women HAVE to BOTH earn a living AND raise children. You know that don't u?" Rosen tweeted.
Rosen issued a statement in which she referring to the so-called "war on women" that Democrats say Republicans have waged this election cycle.
"I apologize to Ann Romney and anyone else who was offended," Rosen said. "Let's declare peace in this phony war and go back to focus on the substance."
Rosen's remarks were condemned on both sides of the aisle, including Democrats with strong ties to President Barack Obama.
"I could not disagree with Hilary Rosen any more strongly," tweeted Obama 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina. "Her comments were wrong and family should be off limits. She should apologize."
"Also Disappointed in Hilary Rosen's comments about Ann Romney," tweeted Obama senior adviser David Axelrod. "They were inappropriate and offensive."
"Hilary Rosen was wrong about Ann Romney & I hope she will say so...," tweeted Joe Trippi, the pundit who managed Howard Dean's 2004 presidential campaign.
SOURCE: IB TIMES
THERE YOU HAVE IT.  ENOUGH SAID.