Ad

Showing posts with label 2012 ELECTIONS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2012 ELECTIONS. Show all posts

Thursday, October 4, 2012

THE BEST Debate of the 2012 Elections. THE BEST Excuses. THE WORST Consequences.


US Viewers Say Romney Won Debate

Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney (L) shakes hands with President Barack Obama following the first presidential debate at the University of Denver, October 3, 2012, in Denver.

Voters think former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was the winner in Wednesday's U.S. presidential debate, according to two overnight polls.

CNN poll of 430 registered voters said 67 percent of respondents believe Romney won the debate, compared to only 25 percent who said President Barack Obama, a Democrat, came out on top.

CBS poll of more than 500 undecided voters showed 46 percent believe Romney won the debate, 22 percent believe Obama won, and 32 percent say they tied.

Campaign trail

With the first debate behind them, the president and Romney headed back to their cross-country travels, seeking voters' support for next month's election.

Romney is holding a rally in the southeastern state of Virginia with his running mate, Congressman Paul Ryan. Obama began his day in Denver, Colorado, the site of Wednesday night's debate, and he will travel later to Wisconsin, which is Ryan's home state.

Economy
During the debate Romney said Obama's policies have weakened the American economy and increased the national debt. He contended the president, if re-elected, would increase taxes and raise government spending to worsen the federal deficit.

"So how do we deal with it [the deficit]? Well, mathematically, there are three ways that you can cut a deficit," said Romney. "One, of course, is to raise taxes; number two is to cut spending, and number three is to grow the economy, because if more people work in a growing economy, they are paying taxes and you can get the job done that way. The president would prefer raising taxes, I understand.  The problem with raising taxes is that it slows down the rate of growth and you can never quite get the job done."

Taxes 

Romney said middle-income Americans have been "buried" or "crushed" under high taxes. He contends tax rates on both corporations and individuals must be reduced.

Obama countered that Romney's tax plan would favor wealthy Americans and force severe cutbacks in important domestic programs.

"This is where budgets matter, because budgets reflect choices," said Obama. "So when Governor Romney indicates that he wants to cut taxes, and potentially benefit [high-income] folks like me and him, and to pay for it we're having to initiate significant cuts in federal support for education, that makes a difference."

The president said the first role of the federal government is to "keep the people safe," but it also should create "frameworks" in which people can succeed. He noted that, in the past, the government has helped create railroads, research institutions and educational institutions.

Health care 

The two men also sparred about the health care reform law that Obama pushed through Congress. Romney once again pledged that he would repeal the law, commonly known as "Obamacare," if he were elected. He criticized the president for focusing on health care rather than the economy during Obama's first years in office.

"There was a survey done of small businesses across the country that [asked], 'What has been the effect of Obamacare on your hiring plans?' And three-quarters of them said it makes us less likely to hire people," said Romney. "I just don't know how the president could have come into office [in January of 2009] facing 23 million people out of work, rising unemployment, an economic crisis at the kitchen table, and spent his energy and passion for two years fighting for Obamacare instead of fighting for jobs for the American people."

Obama said the need to reform the U.S. health care system was and is a key issue for all Americans - business owners and individuals.

"Well, four years ago when I was running for office I was traveling around and having those same conversations that Governor Romney talks about," said Obama. "And it was not just that small businesses were seeing costs skyrocket, and they could not get affordable coverage even if they wanted to provide it to their employees. It was not just that this was the biggest driver of our federal deficit, our overall health care costs. But it was families who were worried about going bankrupt if they got sick."

Accomplishments 

In his closing statement, the president said he wants to expand the accomplishments of his first four years in the White House. He said he will work for change just as hard in a second term as he did in his first.

Romney, who had the last word in the nationally televised debate, said re-electing the president would mean more hardship for the American middle class.

The two candidates will meet for another debate on October 16 - a town hall-style session in which they will take questions from audience members.
read more here http://www.voanews.com


....................................

HERE ARE THE EXCUSES FOR OBAMA'S LACK OF PERFORMANCE...

.......................

Chris Matthews Unloads On Obama: "Where Was Obama Tonight…What Was He Doing?"

The MSNBC host said Obama can't handle another two more debate performances like his debate tonight.

SOURCE: http://www.buzzfeed.com


President Obama's Debate Summed Up In Three Photos

Of all the photos coming out of Wednesday's Presidential debate, three seemed to define how the night went for President Obama.

This reaction shot from the President himself:

This reaction shot from the President himself:
(Getty Images)

And this reaction shot from someone who must really have been rooting for the President:

And this reaction shot from someone who must really have been rooting for the President:
(Getty Images)

How did Mitt Romney feel about the debate?

How did Mitt Romney feel about the debate?
(Getty Images)
SOURCE: 



KRISTOF: PRESIDENT LOOKS 'CONSTIPATED'



When you’ve lost Nicholas Kristof, columnist for The New York Times and Obama lackey, you’ve lost the debate if you’re President Obama. Kristof tweeted just minutes ago:

Romney is relaxed and empathetic, while Obama comes across as a constipated professor. C’mon, Mr. President! #Debates
Kristof has been an unabashed admirer of President Obama. He actually believes that Obama spends too little money, and ought to try higher taxes and more regulation. And even he can’t spin this one for Obama.
SOURCE: 



AL GORE ACTUALLY BLAMES HIGH ALTITUDE IN DENVER FOR OBAMA’S DEBATE PERFORMANCE

Former Vice President Al Gore on Wednesday suggested a curious culprit was to blame for President Barack Obama’s lackluster debate performance: Denver’s high altitude.
“I’m going to say something controversial here,” Gore said on Current TV. “Obama arrived in Denver at 2 p.m. today, just a few hours before the debate started. Romney did his debate prep in Denver. When you go to 5,000 feet and you only have a few hours to adjust — I don’t know.”
Glenn Beck on his radio program Thursday called Gore’s comment the “greatest excuse of all time.”

Philly student's Romney T-shirt likened to KKK sheet

October 03, 2012|By Jonathan Lai and Kristen A. Graham, INQUIRER STAFF WRITERS
A uniform-free “dress-down” day at Charles Carroll High School in Port Richmond turned into a public dressing down for a student who chose to wear a pink T-shirt supporting Mitt Romney for president.
Samantha Pawlucy, a sophomore at Carroll High, said her geometry teacher publicly humiliated her by asking why she was wearing a Romney/Ryan T-shirt and going into the hallway to urge other teachers and students to mock her.
“I was really embarassed and shocked. I didn’t think she’d go in the hallway and scream to everyone,” Pawlucy said. “It wasn’t scary, but it felt weird.”
Pawlucy said she decided to wear the shirt after researching the candidate and President Obama and concluding that she’s a Romney supporter. Her father, Richard Pawlucy, said she was especially interested in Romney’s opposition to partial-birth abortion.
He said he recently registered to vote as an independent but was not involved in the Romney campaign.
Samantha Pawlucy The teacher then allegedly called a non-teaching assistant into the room who tried to write on the t-shirt with a marker. She allegedly told to remove her shirt and she would be given another one.
During the incident, Samantha Pawlucy said the teacher told her that Carroll High is a “Democratic school” and wearing a Republican shirt is akin to the teacher, who is black, wearing a KKK shirt.
The teacher could not be teached to comment. Fernando Gallard, district spokesman said an investigation is ongoing. He said the student had the right to wear the t-shirt.
Samantha Pawlucy said she felt publicly humiliated by her teacher and was initially unsure how to respond.
“I just laughed because I was nervous,” she said.
Her father said she was visibly upset when she returned home, but at first did not want to tell her story, for fear of retaliation from the school — suspension, being moved out of the class, or expulsion.
The student said she also felt shunned by classmates because she reported the incident to the principal.
“I have some friends that won’t talk to me anymore beause of it,” she said. “Because I told the principal what happened…they’re mad at me.”
The parents met on Monday with Joyce Hoag, the school principal. Richard Pawlucy said that during the meeting the teacher insisted she had been joking. She stormed out and left the school. He said he was told he could file an official complaint with the district which he plans to do on Thursday. He said he was also given the option of letting the principal handle the incident with the teacher getting some form of training.
Gallard declined to identify the parties or confirm any details of the meeting. He said the investigation began “with the simple action of the parent calling the principal and complaining.” For the investigation to continue, it requires an official complaint, he said.
When Samantha Pawlucy went back to her geometry class Tuesday, she said, she was shocked to find her teacher in class. She claimed the teacher told the class that she can no longer joke around with the class because a student had gotten her in trouble.
The teen said she was so upset by the teachers’ comments that she left the classroom and hid in the bathroom until the end of the class.
The roster was later rearranged so that the teacher remains in the school, but is not teaching Pawlucy’s class, her father said. Gallard confirmed that the teacher continues to teach during the investigation but is no longer teaching that class.
The Pawlucy family has another student in the school, a freshman who also wore a Romney shirt, and was belittled by classmates.
Richard Pawlucy said that after filing the complaint, he’s not sure he will willingly work with the school again.
“I'm not sure what we're gonna do from this point,” he said, “I don't know if I should meet with the school again. I don't really think the principal is gonna help us on this.”
After the official complaint is received, Gallard said, the district will conduct a series of interviews over the next days, eventually determining whether there is sufficient evidence to move forward with disciplinary action.
Pawlucy was within her rights to wear the shirt, Gallard said, on a “dress-down” day where non-uniform clothing “within reason” is permitted. He said he hasn’t encountered a situation like this in ten years of working as a spokesman for the district.
“It’s a Constitutional right. It’s freedom of speech,” Gallard said.
A spokesman for the teachers’ union, the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, declined to comment.
Contact Jonathan Lai at 215-854-5151, jlai@philly.com, or on Twitter @elaijuh.



Thursday, April 26, 2012

Obama Birth Certificate False. Obama Exception to the Law. Obama Doesn't Need the Constitution.

This information is really interesting regarding Obama. The comments about these videos are even more telling. I cannot say that all of this information is true and factual because it is gathered from the Internet. However, I can say that it is extremely interesting and opens up a whole new set of questions...







 Comments: "Firstly let me say I am a 6 year Navy Veteran of the Iraq War. Secondly, this war on Iraq is such a scam and lie. We did not go over there to help the Iraqi people set up a democratic government for themselves we went to war to protect our capital interests in the region. Obama has no legal right to be in office or deny a summons to a trial. He has no legal authority to declare war during a time of peace without Congresses permission."


 "Ms Taitz, head of this campaign against Obama, was sanctioned by the courts & pronounced guilty of abusing the legal system with these false charges prior to the Atlanta trial. Should one politically driven judge in Atlanta be allowed to force the commander of the largest military force on our planet into responding to charges already proven by the courts to be false? I assume it was not your intent to send a message that president Obama is 'uppity'."




 Comments: "It is common sense that if they had a valid birth certificate, they would just produce it and walk out. The fact that they are seeking any means to not produce it, clearly infers, that they don't have one. You don't have to be a genius to understand this." "There is apparently no requirement to have anyones birth certificate in the first place since the context is the petitions for the ballot in NJ. Petitioners could put you on the ballot, they don't even require your consent!. None of this obliges you to show your birth certificate to anyone. In the greater context regarding the issue of Obama's place of birth etc, it is a wonder as to why there has not been more transparency."






 Comments: "I don't get the point of this. Who gives a $%&* if his birth certificate is fake, why don't we talk about the fact that NATO air strikes under his command killed hundreds of thousands of Libyans, destroyed cities, and "liberated" Sitre through bloodshed and utter destruction, and assassinated Muammar Al-Gaddafi with CIA and French funded "rebels". Afghanistan, and the US militaries Opium trade in the Poppy fields there? The bombing of Famine stricken Somalia, bombing of Yemen, mass killings?"


-----------




Obama Lawyer Admits Birth Certificate Is A Forgery



Obama defense attorney Alexandra M. Hill
A lawyer representing U.S. President Barack Obama has admitted the long-form birth certificate presented by the White House last yearis a forgery – but that does not disqualify him from appearing on the ballot this November.
Defense attorney Alexandra M. Hill made the comments during a recent New Jersey ballot challenge hearing, brought about by Tea Party members who question his eligibility to appear on the state’s presidential primary ballot. Attorney for the plaintiffs, Mario Apuzzo, argued that President Obama has furnished proof of his “natural born” citizenship status to the state of New Jersey.
Apuzzo went on to say that Obama’s father was not an American citizen, meaning President Obama is not a “natural born” citizen and ineligible for the office he holds.
Hill tried to dismiss the suit because, while the U.S. Constitution limits the office of president to only those who have a “natural born” citizenship status, New Jersey law does not require a candidate to furnish proof of his or her status.
According to the Tea Party Tribune, Hill went on to admit that the long form birth certificatereleased online by the White House in April 2011 is indeed a forgery that did not originate from an actual paper document and therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status.

Mario Apuzzo
The issue of the birth certificate is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot,” Hill contended.
President Obama’s birth certificate “was likely part of a contrived plot by counterfeiters to endow Obama with mere political support while simultaneously making the image intentionally appear absurd and, therefore, invalid as evidence toward proving Obama’s ineligibility in a court of law,” the Tea Party Tribune quoted Hill as saying.
Questions about the long-form birth certificate’s validity were raised days after it was released. Several people have released videos showing how the virtual document is comprised of layers, showing it was created using image-enhancing computer software.
Last month, a Maricopa County law enforcement agency ended a six-month long probe of the document, concluding the birth certificate is not authentic.
“Hill went on to contort reasoning by implying that Obama needs only invoke his political popularity, not legal qualifications, in order to be a candidate,” the paper reported.
Judge Masin denied the motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.

WASHINGTON - APRIL 27: US President Barack Obama released a long form version of his birth certificate after extended criticism by those who do not believe he was born in the United States. Now his lawyers have been forced to admit it was a fake!

WASHINGTON - APRIL 27: US President Barack Obama released a long form version of his birth certificate after extended criticism by those who do not believe he was born in the United States. Now his lawyers have been forced to admit it was a fake!

Photo credit:  
Brendan Smialowski / Getty Images 

SOURCE: 

NEWS RELEASE MAY 22, 2012
22 PAGES OF "PROOF" THAT OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A FORGERY...
Obama eligibility challenges spread to 6 states
Decision in Georgia case expected soon, but ballot concerns going viral 
(WND) - An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.


But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.


The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.


A default presumably would have meant a recommendation from the judge that Obama’s name be stricken from the ballot, a decision which would head for review immediately by Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp.


He, however, was the one who warned Obama of the “peril” of not participating in the hearing when Obama and his attorney had asked that the event be canceled.


Discover what the Constitution’s reference to “natural born citizen” means and whether Barack Obama qualifies, in the ebook version of “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”


Whatever the outcome in Georgia, the issue is gaining traction in other states, too, including Alabama, Tennessee, Arizona, New Hampshire, and even Illinois, Obama’s home political base.


There, in a complaint recently filed by Stephen F. Boulton of McCarthy Duffy LLP and Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, their client is asking for a change in state law to allow the vetting of political candidates.


Obama isn’t even mentioned by name, but don’t think for a minute that the requested change wouldn’t include his candidacy.


The plaintiff is Sharon Meroni, who long has fought inside the system for a way to challenge the candidacies there. In her new case, filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, she is petitioning for a judicial review of the state’s election procedures as they exist now.


Targeted are the state Board of Elections, members of the board, several county clerks and others, including candidates Dan Duffy and Amanda Howland.


Meroni, a registered voter in the 27th Legislative District in the state, said her concern is that “only candidates qualified for office under the Illinois and United States Constitutions appear on the ballot.”


The state’s primary is in March.


The case alleges the candidates did not provide sufficient proof that they are U.S. citizens as required to hold the office being sought “as is required by the Illinois Constitution of 1970.”


State officials refused to remove the names from the ballots, so Meroni has gone to court. Granting ballot access, she said in the complaint, “is contrary to law, against the manifest weight of the evidence, arbitrary and capricious, and a denial of the rights of the petitioner.”


Kreep told WND the way the system is established in Illinois it essentially allows political parties to determine who runs for office, and unless voters find out about a filing and can assemble a formal objection within five days, their concerns are dismissed.


And the system has no procedure for verifying the eligibility of candidates, he said.


That particular issue has been in the headlines for the past four years, since before Obama’s 2008 election victory, because of the questions that remain over his eligibility. The U.S. Constitution demands a “natural born citizen” be president and the Founders probably thought that to be the offspring of two citizen parents when they wrote the term.


But Obama’s father never was a citizen. There also are those who contend he was not even born in the United States.


Kreep said the Illinois procedures make it virtually impossible for candidates to be challenged for their eligibility.


He said there likely will be raised in other states concerns similar to those in Illinois, where “barriers now in existence … bar voters from reasonable investigation of the citizenship of a candidate.”


That’s simply a deprivation of the constitutional right to due process, he said. The case seeks a declaration that the political maneuvers are unconstitutional.


There also have been assembled campaigns specifically to encourage voters to file eligibility complaints about candidates with states. One such effort is the Obama Ballot Challenge, which lists contacts for state elections offices across the country.


It is, of course, the states that actually run elections; a national election is just the compilation of the results from the 50 states.


“A candidate that is not legally qualified to be on the ballot, such as Barack Obama, steals votes from other candidates who are legally on the ballot,” the site advises.


WND previously reported that cases already have been begun in New Hampshire, where state officials rejected the claims; Alabama, Tennessee and Arizona.


The newest round of court actions do not try to have a judge determine Obama is not qualified for the Oval Office and remove him from it, they simply challenge his eligibility for the 2012 election.


Many of the cases cite Minor v. Happersett, a U.S. Supreme Court opinion from 1875 that said a “natural born citizen” would be a person whose parents both were citizens.


“This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States,” said one of the filings.


It continued, “Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama’s natural-born status.


“Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent.”


Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, also is working on several of the issues, and has brought the question in court in Arizona.


“We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9th Circuit. The 9th Circuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit,” he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.


Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.


“The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee Secretary of State. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama’s Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number,” he said.


He said if the cases succeed, the Democrats would not be able to list Obama as their candidate for 2012.


“Neither lawsuit discusses Obama’s place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF’s lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined ‘natural-born citizen’ as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant,” Van Irion’s group said.


WND also has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation into concerns Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state’s election ballot in 2012.


Other attorneys involved in the Georgia case are J. Mark Hatfield and Orly Taitz.


Hatfield has told WND that the goal is for a court determination on the definition of “natural born citizen,” which then could be applied directly to Obama’s candidacy.




Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-eligibility-challenges-spread-to-6-states/
SOURCE: TEAPARTY.ORG
SNOPES CLAIMS THE ABOVE BIRTHER CLAIMS TO BE FALSE... 
LINK HERE...SNOPES




Frank Marshall Davis Bio

placeholder
Frank Marshall Davis (1905-1987) was a Communist Party USA (CPUSA) propagandist in Chicago and Hawaii, as well as a writer and poet. The FBI had Davis under investigation or surveillance for 19 years, compiling a 600-page FBI file. He was on the FBI's 'Security Index A', meaning he would be arrested in the event of national emergency.
In 1930's Chicago, CPUSA recruited journalists to help spread Soviet influence in American public opinion. Frank Marshall Davis was one of them. A graduate of Kansas State Journalism School, Frank Marshall Davis joined the Communist Party and began writing for The Chicago Star. He was a colleague of journalist Vernon Jarrett, father-in-law of Obama confidant Valerie Jarrett. Davis also taught at Chicago's Abraham Lincoln School, a Communist run training school run by CPUSA. Davis authored three major volumes of poetry, and later an autobiographical sex novel under a pseudonym.
In 1948, the Kremlin ordered CPUSA to facilitate a US withdrawal from the Hawaii as US naval forces were considered an obstacle to Soviet expansion in Asia. CPUSA assigned Frank Marshall Davis to Honolulu where he began writing for the Communist Newspaper, the Honolulu Recordin 1948. In his columns, Davis flawlessly mirrored official Soviet propaganda - he blamed American capitalism for starting World War II, denounced the Marshall Plan, preached wealth redistribution, nationalization of industry and government healthcare, while bashing Wall Street. Davis also helped organize the Communist controlled ILWU (union) in a failed effort to take over the Hawaiian government in 1949. The Hawaii NAACP chapter complained to its national office, "Comrade Frank Marshall Davis suddenly appeared on the scene to propagandize the membership with the purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line." In 1956, Davis was subpoenaed by the Senate Subcommittee on Un-American Activities and pleaded the fifth. Dreams from My Real Father makes the case that on August 4, 1961, Frank Marshall Davis became the father of the future 44th President of the United States and indoctrinated him with a Marxist ideology during his formative years.