Do you want to know where the negative reporting on Obama is being gathered and reported? There is actually a site set up to control this behavior. It's ATTACK WATCH.COM. Oh freedom of speech, where hast thou gone? We have leaned on thee through the Constitution of the United States of America for so long and now thou art being pulled out from under our feet like a dirty rug that needs cleaning.If you are interested in clear reporting on the OBAMA issues, here is a site I would recommend that is trying to report on issues that may be important to you during the remainder of his campaign...I mean presidency. This is just a simple blog, but it has some great reporting...OBAMA REPORT You should definitely give it a read and ignore the other one I mentioned. It has facts such as the latest report...
"Poll: 55% of Americans believe GOP will win 2012 Presidential election, 37% believe Obama will be re-elected
According to an ABC News/Washington Post survey, released on Monday, 55% of Americans believe the GOP will recapture the White House in the 2012 Presidential election. 37% believe President Obama will be re-elected."
Love it. Love it. Love it!
The last I heard, we were still living in a democratic society that viewed the U.S. Constitution as binding law of the land, providing citizens what people in other countries come here to have...freedom. How has this changed? We are moving in a dramatic way towards a Marxist society through the leadership of Obama. Let me define that for you so you may fully get the drastic difference in the direction we are moving...
Marxism is an economic and socio-political worldview and method of socioeconomic inquiry that centers upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change, and an analysis and critique of the development of capitalism. Marxism was pioneered in the early to mid 19th century by two German philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism encompasses Marxian economic theory, a sociological theory and a revolutionary view of social change that has influenced socialist political movements worldwide.
The Marxian analysis begins with an analysis of material conditions, taking at its starting point the necessary economic activities required by human society to provide for its material needs. The form of economic organization, or mode of production, is understood to be the basis from which the majority of other social phenomena — including social relations, political and legal systems, morality and ideology — arise (or at the least by which they are greatly influenced). These social relations form the superstructure, of which the economic system forms the base. As the forces of production, most notably technology, improve, existing forms of social organization become inefficient and stifle further progress.
These inefficiencies manifest themselves as social contradictions in society in the form of class struggle. Under the capitalist mode of production, this struggle materializes between the minority who own the means of production; the bourgeoisie, and the vast majority of the population who produce goods and services; the proletariat. Taking the idea that social change occurs because of the struggle between different classes within society who are under contradiction against each other, the Marxist analysis leads to the conclusion that capitalism oppresses the proletariat, the inevitable result being a proletarian revolution.
Marxism views the socialist system as being prepared by the historical development of capitalism. According to Marxism, Socialism is a historical necessity (but not however, an inevitability [1]). In a socialist society private property in the means of production would be superseded by co-operative ownership. The socialist system would succeed capitalism as humanity's mode of production through worker's revolution. Capitalism according to Marxist theory can no longer sustain the living standards of the population due to its need to compensate for falling rates of profit by driving down wages, cutting social benefits and pursuing military aggression. A socialist economy would not base production on the accumulation of capital, but would instead base production and economic activity on the criteria of satisfying human needs - that is, production would be carried out directly for use.
Eventually, socialism would give way to a communist stage of history: a classless, stateless system based on common ownership and free-access, superabundance and maximum freedom for individuals to develop their own capacities and talents. As a political movement, Marxism advocates for the creation of such a society.
....
Marxists believe that the transition from capitalism to socialism is an inevitable part of the development of human society; as Lenin stated, "it is evident that Marx deduces the inevitability of the transformation of capitalist society [into a socialist society] wholly and exclusively from the economic law of motion of contemporary society."
Marxists believe that a socialist society will be far better for the majority of the populace than its capitalist counterpart, for instance, prior to the Russian revolution of 1917, Lenin wrote that "The socialization of production is bound to lead to the conversion of the means of production into the property of society... This conversion will directly result in an immense increase in productivity of labour, a reduction of working hours, and the replacement of the remnants, the ruins of small-scale, primitive, disunited production by collective and improved labour." Wikipedia
As a point of reference to the above information on Marxism...It is not gone. After/during WWI, there was a metamorphosis of sorts into Third International, which later morphed into the group called Comintern. Why is this important? Because Obama is affiliated with this particular group, which for most of you will not be a surprise at all.
Here are a series of articles/links that connect Obama directly to the group called Comintern (otherwise communists)...
"Mubarak and Obama: How America’s Comintern Works in the Middle East" New Eastern Outlook
"Barack Obama and Gordon Brown: a two-man socialist Comintern" Telegraph
"Dupes – How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century By Paul Kengor"http://www.blogger.com/goog_1142902563
Here is a quote from the above author:
"
Obama’s Communist Mentor
Frank Marshall Davis parroted the Communist line and attacked Democratic icon Harry Truman.
When you write a book, particularly one that requires several years of research, you tend to encounter a bunch of unexpected information. Sometimes you find things that, if reported, will undoubtedly prompt partisans to demand you explain yourself. For me, this begins that process of explaining, given that one of the major characters in my new book on American Communists, Dupes, is Frank Marshall Davis.Allegations regarding Davis’s Communism are sure to infuriate the Left because of the influence Davis once had over our president. He was a drinking buddy of Barack Obama’s maternal grandfather, Stanley Dunham, and spent time with young Obama. He turns up in the president’s memoir, Dreams from My Father, shrewdly identified only as “Frank”: “I was intrigued by old Frank, with his books and whiskey breath and the hint of hard-earned knowledge behind the hooded eyes.” Recently, a U.S. Communist-party official confirmed the relationship, bragging in a speech of the Communist Davis’s formative influence over Obama. And yet when the allegations surfaced during the 2008 campaign, they went virtually unreported in the mainstream media." http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/248877/obama%E2%80%99s-communist-mentor-paul-kengor
Don't give up on our U.S. Constitution. The Founding Fathers are probably tossing and turning in their graves. Our Constitution is not just a piece of old paper. It's a document that was fought for. It is a document that is part of why we have the freedoms and liberties we have, although they are all hanging on a thread. Let's fight to keep our freedoms. Let's get back to being proud to be Americans and get involved in protecting our Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment